On May 26, 2011, at 8:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote: > As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who > acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were alleged to > have taken place. Richard says he spoke directly with the lawyer who handled > SBS's will, and traveled to some of various places at issue and spoke with > people who were contempories of SBS, and M. Vaj's sources seem 2 or 3 steps > removed from the events they are commenting on, and are never identified in > any detail. Usually they are "a student of so and so"
You're confusing tow very different sources. And let's not mention that our Dear Richar N. sounds like a drooling TB. I mena, how many of those are actually left who are hip to the news? HINT: Richard, read Bourque's expose on the "life-long celibate". Time to wake up the kids.
