From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sparaig Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 7:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
--- In [email protected] <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Yifu" <yifuxero@...> wrote: > > The degree of evidence imo doesn't rise to the level of a criminal conviction; (unanimous agreement among jurors); but rather a "preponderance" of evidence as in civil cases. (or the ancient Roman system which had a mere majority for "guilty"). I'd say guilty, 95% but why bring this up again and again. It's about as water under the bridge as "Weiner-gate". and no longer of much interest. imo. I haven't read the book, and don't intend to, but for "preponderance of evidence" to apply, you would need more than one witness to the events because the consisted of personal interactions of two parties. There's no stained shirt, for example. There were numerous witnesses, in the person of multiple women. Each had their own "events". Only one has had the guts to write a book.
