Yes, an amazing transformation, right between our eyes. "The world is as you are". Using logic and reason to "confirm" an inner feeling. We have all done it, but to pretend it is objective and leads to The Truth is baloney on white bread.
--- In [email protected], "Ravi Yogi" <raviyogi@...> wrote: > > Spot on Jim, it's total rejection of anything positive, post after post, > question after question and total acceptance of everything negative, no > questions asked. If someone talks positive it's all subjective > experience, opinion, mind control, lacking any benefit to the world, > trying to feel special but if it's negative they turn into authentic, > genuine, credible witnesses. > > --- In [email protected], "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> > wrote: > > > > Funny that the anti-Maharishi, anti-TMO, anti-"enlightenmentudeness" > clique here continuously claims that those who make positive claims > about Maharishi, the TMO and enlightenment are doing so to garner > attention and feel special and elevated above others. The same could > easily be said about those claiming to have had sex with Maharishi. > After all, what would be more special than that? "Look at me, I boinked > Maharishi...". Yeah, look at you, center stage... > > > > There is also a propensity among this anti-everything-Maharishi crowd > to question any experience had in the presence of Maharishi. Why not > seriously question these claims of sex? After all, this could be some > kind of fantasy fulfillment for the women involved, after rounding for > years and becoming progressively more and more unstable (as we are > always told by the TM detractors here regarding the results of TM and > TMSP). It sounds like confirmation bias to me. > > > > Regardless of our opinions, there is zero evidence of Maharishi > having had sex with anyone. Lots of hearsay, accusations, rumors and > beliefs- an airtight case within airtight minds- however the only things > missing are *facts* and *evidence*. > > > > Seems that going after this sacred cow of MMY having sex isn't in the > best interests of those with an agenda against Maharishi, doesn't > support their story, their version of reality that they cling to so > dearly. > > >
