--- In [email protected], "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@...> wrote: > > Funny that the anti-Maharishi, anti-TMO, anti-"enlightenmentudeness" clique > here continuously claims that those who make positive claims about Maharishi, > the TMO and enlightenment are doing so to garner attention and feel special > and elevated above others. The same could easily be said about those claiming > to have had sex with Maharishi. After all, what would be more special than > that? "Look at me, I boinked Maharishi...". Yeah, look at you, center > stage... > > There is also a propensity among this anti-everything-Maharishi crowd to > question any experience had in the presence of Maharishi. Why not seriously > question these claims of sex? After all, this could be some kind of fantasy > fulfillment for the women involved, after rounding for years and becoming > progressively more and more unstable (as we are always told by the TM > detractors here regarding the results of TM and TMSP). It sounds like > confirmation bias to me. > > Regardless of our opinions, there is zero evidence of Maharishi having had > sex with anyone. Lots of hearsay, accusations, rumors and beliefs- an > airtight case within airtight minds- however the only things missing are > *facts* and *evidence*. > > Seems that going after this sacred cow of MMY having sex isn't in the best > interests of those with an agenda against Maharishi, doesn't support their > story, their version of reality that they cling to so dearly.
Bingo !
