--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <wayback71@> wrote:
> , no one much cares what
> > > a substitute teacher thinks about anything.
> >
> > Oooh nasty. I am not a sub tacher, but I work with a few. Like most of
> us, many have their own personal area of interest or passion. Some are
> downright interesting or creative, and use sub teaching to have a
> flexible life style so they can do other things than work. I have been
> stunned to hear some of the things they do in their free time - hike the
> App Trail, habitat for humnanity, big time bird watching, painting,
> major photography. Some are struggling mightily to get a bit of money so
> they can be at home when their kids are. Others are dealing with some
> personal fragility and don't want the responsibilitiy - at least for a
> few years - of their own classroom. Have a heart here, Barry.
> At the risk of being a ditto head.  I was wondering how long it would be
> before this snub surfaced.  No long it turns out.  Can you imagine, can
> you just imagine Barry making a similiar comment about a street
> musician? 

An obvious example of a derision-worthy occupation. I think we can all relate 
to your example.



 I didn't comment on it, cause I thought Barry was making a
> joke.  I hope he was.
> It's as if
> > > their legends-in-their-own-minds "celebrity" was
> > > completely dependent on associating themselves with
> > > another "celebrity."
> > >
> > Honestly, Barry, I think most people on this forum don't derive any
> sense of status or sheen from their days with MMY. And I don't get that
> just about anyone here feels they are a legend in their own mind. Maybe
> it is just that I don't consider them anything more special than typical
> - and if they do, that is their problem and really out of touch.
> I don't think there is anything that can disabuse Barry of this notion. 
> This is one of the foundations of his posting here.  Generally, it
> something that must be reiterated in some fashion twice or three times a
> day.
>


Reply via email to