--- In [email protected], "PaliGap" <compost1uk@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ravi Yogi" raviyogi@ wrote: > > > > Dear maskedzebra -.... > > > Enlightenment is something special -I quote you "(I was) > > INCAPABLE of being bested in a one-on-one encounter with > > another human being"), "more versatile, more creative, more > > attuned, more commanding", "my enlightenment took was > > confronting the consciousness of those NOT in Unity > > Consciousness—those, that is, who desired to be the > > beneficiaries of my superior state of functioning". > > Another quote of yours - "Not only did my consciousness rule > > the consciousness of the other person. Any attempt by that > > other person to pit their consciousness against my own, resulted > > in the dramatic demonstration that indeed my consciousness > > was dominant, not just dominant in the influence it expressed > > in terms of power and integrity and silence, but in the actual > > range of creative and intelligent responsiveness. My repertoire > > of possible responses to any person, or to any situation, > > was virtually unlimited—that is, while in the state of Unity > > Consciousness." > > > Enlightenment doesn't mean now you are more dominant, you > > have power, integrity or having a an unlimited repertoire > > of responses. > > I'm with you and your beloved on this one Ravi!
LOL..thanks Richard, but seriously you don't have to be with me - you acknowledge my beloved and that's all that matters. > I found this > first-hand account of UC to be extremely odd indeed. Not that > I'm one of the experts here on the ins and outs of states > of consciousness. But, and I'm sorry to say this MZ, I found > it frankly rather unattractive and distasteful. Congrats are > certainly in order for your having freed yourself from this > "state of consciousness". I'm inclined to think Rick was > quite reasonable in gently questioning whether what MZ thought > was UC, WAS UC, (It's a lovely expression that: "I thought I > knew"). > > And call me simple if you like - but in "unity", who would > be "besting" who? And, more to the point, why? >
