--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:48 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 2011, at 4:06 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, William Parkinson > > <ameradian2@> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Thank you also Turq (Lawson) for your warm welcome too. There > > is much I still have to learn about TM, but also about the members > > here.� Still it has been heuristically useful for me to say the > > least!� � > > > > > > > > Um........ > > > > > > > > I note that you not only confused me with someone else but you > > never bothered to respond to my links to research on stuff... > > > > > > > > Gotta wonder. > > > > > > > > > I believe he is deeply familiar with meditation research in general. > > > > > > > Those aren't meditation research in general studies. Those are > > studies on a specific state found within TM and apparently not > > elsewhere. At least, I can't find any reference to breath > > suspension [or synonyms] and meditation except the TM research. > > > It turned out to be insignificant, except of course to TM researchers > who want to believe the apnea episodes are significant. >
Certainly that is the case, that the TM researchers thought (and still do) that these episodes are significant. I'm curious as to why you think they are not? L.
