Good points all - No I haven't seen any of them for ages. Thanks for challenging my stale impressions though, and having an interest in a possibly future robust Movement. I am intrigued by what you say about Bevan, who I always found incredibly long-winded and boring, despite his obvious devotion.
--- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote: > > > > "To change the policies of the TMO which you correctly describe is from > > Maharishi, another revolutionary must arise. Can Raja Ram do that ? > > Perhaps." > > > > As chief bureaucrat for the TMO possibly, but not as the public face of the > > TMO. Tony Ram seems like a really, really nice guy, but if Maharishi had a > > charisma level of 100, Tony's is in the single digits. Unfortunately true > > of the other TMO public figures as well. > > > That may well be Jim. I think it is now important to give Raja Ram some time > to consider the future of the TMO. Tony is nobodys fool and we have not yet > seen his initiatives. > > And, hello: he knows very well he is not Maharishi ! > > Regarding your last comment, did you see Bevan speak live, in person lately ? > Did you attend a lecture by David Lynch lately ? >
