> > On Jul 24, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Mark Landau wrote: > > > > Thank you, Judy. There are quite a lot of things that get > > communicated here that hold no meaning for me whatsoever. > > I think my participation here has peaked. I'll need to > > start investing more of my time on survival...
Mark, I can certainly understand your interest "peaking" after only a few days here. Good luck with everything if you choose to move on. If it makes you feel any better about "missing anything," take the following blurb by Judy and multiply it times 50, ever week, forever. It's really all she has to say, or seemingly ever will have to say. For many years it's been the same "THESE PEOPLE ARE BAD AND I AM GOOD" and "THESE PEOPLE LIE AND I NEVER DO" and "I CAN DOCUMENT EVERYTHING," screamed at the same uncaring readers, day after day, week after week, and year after year. You'll notice that no one ever takes her up on her "offer" to "document everything." The readers don't care because 1) they've heard it all before, 2) because her obsession with these "enemies" never mattered to them in the first place, and 3) because they have lives. The only thing you'd be missing from FFL if you moved on is watching Judy repeating variants of the following rant over and over and over, in a seemingly never-ending quest to demonstrate to the world that she *doesn't* have a life. --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > Sorry, but I can document everything I've said about Vaj; > he can't document or even cite a single example of a lie > from me, nor can anyone else here. I simply don't lie; > I have no need to. > > Anyone who knows the players here can see the intentional > deception in Vaj's comment at the end of his current post > about initiators being brainwashed; three of the TM > teachers who doubt Vaj's claimed TM status are disaffected > in one respect or another and haven't been part of the > movement in some years. They're all on record in the > archives of this forum as suspecting Vaj has not told > the truth about his experience with TM, not because he's > a TM critic but because he's said a number of things > about the technique and how it's taught that are grossly > factually inaccurate and easily revealed as such by > reference to the TM checking notes. > > Again, all this is very well documented. > > With regard to "Poor Barry and Curtis," yes, Curtis is > relatively innocent compared to Vaj. But "Poor Barry" > isn't; he's worse. I could document from the archives > literally *hundreds* of falsehoods from him. > > The Web site Vaj mentions, as he well knows, is not mine. > It's a site put up by Andrew Skolnick, author of the > infamous JAMA article on TM, in revenge for having been > repeatedly outed as a liar on the Usenet newsgroup alt.m.t > by me and several other TMers. > > As for "many of Mahesh's closest inside men" agreeing with > Vaj, that's a truly pathetic claim just on its face. > > Mark, it's a pity we have a few deeply malicious people on > this forum. Most of us have been enjoying your reminiscences > and reflections. I hope you don't let the conflicts between > the former and the latter groups drive you away. There's no > need for you to get involved in them.
