That's because donkeys don't think very clearly. Our very own Eeyore struts around on all fours thinking the world of himself, while everyone else just looks at him and thinks, "What an ass". I have always found his thinking confused, evasive, unclear and contradictory. I am not sure there is enough grey matter there in his donkey brain for him to know when he is intentionally lying. Oh and for those who think I am insulting him, I'll use Vaj's excuse that I am practicing "wrathful compassion", whatever the f*ck that is.
--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > > > > On Jul 25, 2011, at 2:45 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jul 25, 2011, at 3:43 AM, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > > > > You'll notice that no one ever takes her up on her "offer" > > > > > to "document everything." The readers don't care because > > > > > 1) they've heard it all before, 2) because her obsession > > > > > with these "enemies" never mattered to them in the first > > > > > place, and 3) because they have lives. > > > > > > > > <bell sounds> That is the correct answer! You win a chain of > > > > insulting email messages from J. Stein, editor at large! ;-) > > > > > > But neither of you are claiming #4: she's lying. > > > > > > Why is that, I wonder... > > > > No need to state the obvious. Curtis has done such an > > excellent job of documenting it, over and over and over > > again via his own inner integrity. It became glaringly > > obvious even to those who missed it before or ignored > > it out of some shared angst for which Judy was a kind > > of spokesperson. > > Interestingly, until our exchange prior to this one, > Curtis had never accused me of lying, at least not on > FFL. He did say in an exchange prior to *that* one > that he had done so on alt.m.t, but he refused to give > examples, and I don't recall this. > > In fact, he said in that exchange: > > "Suffice it to say that we both doubted each other's > credibility back then but have moved beyond that now." > > As to the recent accusation, he got that one wrong. In > that case it was probably my fault for not being > clearer, but I explained what I had meant in post > #282345. > > Bottom line, Curtis has accused me of lying on FFL > exactly once, but failed entirely to document it. What > Vaj wrote above is pure fantasy. It's a lie, in fact. >
