Dear CurtisDB,  Thanks, I love you too for the same reason in reverse.  Someone 
needs to speak up for the true-bliever here to make it worthwhile, this is a 
hard job.  Oh,I took the same classes.
-Buck in FF

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > 
> > Golly, what a grump.  You were a philosophy major?
> >
> 
> We spent a month on the philosophy of science and during that month our 
> teacher did everything he could to subvert its methods to protect the 
> religious beliefs of the movement.  I am familiar with the routine you and 
> Hegelin run from the inside, having been pretty good at it myself when I was, 
> like you, a propagandist for Maharishi's beliefs. It makes it all seem so 
> much more reasonable to hit the buzzwords of science to try to bypass 
> people's critical thinking.  Most people's understanding of its methods is so 
> poor that just invoking some of its terms are enough for them to give an idea 
> a pass from scrutiny. 
> 
> But trying to point out when the terms of science are being misused to 
> deceive makes me far from grumpy.  It delights me.  That is why you are one 
> of my favorite posters here.  Without you we would be bereft of the movement 
> propaganda POV, and that would detract from my enjoyment in posting here very 
> much.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Doug:
> > > 
> > > "which is corroborated by discoveries in modern physics and neuroscience, 
> > > reveals an underlying cause: the build up of acute stress in the 
> > > collective consciousness of societies, which fuels violence in the 
> > > actions of man and imbalance in the events of nature."
> > > 
> > > Me:
> > > 
> > > There are scientific principles and theories in play here.  The most 
> > > important one is our mind's quest for order and explanation in a complex 
> > > world.  We see forms and shapes in random clouds and Jesus in a taco.  It 
> > > is what our mind does when faced with randomness or complexity.  It is 
> > > effortless and unconscious.  
> > > 
> > > The world seems like a safer, more understandable place if we can 
> > > associate the thoughts we have in our heads with bad things like war and 
> > > natural disasters. Oh, the opium of believing we can prevent these things 
> > > from happening with our all powerful minds, like magic.
> > > 
> > > And if you just spouted some religious belief that makes you feel all 
> > > comfy inside, I wouldn't be tempted to write.  But you had to throw in 
> > > the term "science", perverting its meaning in a dishonest attempt to prop 
> > > up religious beliefs as if they were based on established scientific 
> > > method derived theories. This is wrong.  I know who you learned it from.  
> > > The spin master himself.
> > > 
> > > And this thoery that victimizes the victim, as if the people of Japan had 
> > > it coming from all their "stress" and "imbalance" compared to any other 
> > > people in the world is sick.  Do you really think that all the people in 
> > > the drought in Africa deserve this?
> > > 
> > > Well, the Hindu belief system does.  And I guess as a pseudo-outcaste 
> > > Hindu you might share the belief that all is well and wisely put, that no 
> > > child dying in pain didn't earn it in a past life.  And as much as I find 
> > > that view repugnant, it doesn't rise to the level of deceptive 
> > > communication as asserting that any of this nonsense is scientifically 
> > > based.  
> > > 
> > > Own your beliefs.  You believe spiritual claims because it makes sense to 
> > > you and it makes you feel good. Fair enough.  But you can drop the drop 
> > > the pseudo-scientific 3 out of 4 dentists surveyed posturing.  It just 
> > > doesn't fly anymore. 
> > > 
> > >
> > 
> > Golly, what a grump.  You were a philosophy major?
> > 
> >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What do conflicts in the Middle East and natural disasters in Japan 
> > > > have in common?
> > > > 
> > > > Very little on the surface of things— one is man-made, the other 
> > > > nature-made.
> > > > 
> > > > But a closer analysis of the mechanics of how nature functions at the 
> > > > deepest levels from the perspective of the ancient Vedic science of 
> > > > consciousness, which is corroborated by discoveries in modern physics 
> > > > and neuroscience, reveals an underlying cause: the build up of acute 
> > > > stress in the collective consciousness of societies, which fuels 
> > > > violence in the actions of man and imbalance in the events of nature.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are conflicts in the Middle East
> > > > > > and disasters in Japan preventable?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Technologies of the ancient Vedic science of consciousness
> > > > > > can reduce violence in society, imbalances in nature
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > As predicted nearly 5 years ago, a large group of meditation 
> > > > > > experts in Iowa produces dramatic fall in US violent crime rates, 
> > > > > > number of destructive hurricanes
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > "I invite all well-wishers of peace to fully investigate the 
> > > > > scientific principles and the research which underlie these 
> > > > > technologies and then, if your questions are answered, to partner 
> > > > > with us in promoting a world of permanent peace." —Dr. John Hagelin
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Earthquakes are interesting. There is very little that shakes your
> > > > > > > belief in Reality As You Know It as everything shaking under your 
> > > > > > > feet.
> > > > > > > The very term "terra firma" comes into question.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I've been in a few. The biggest was in Agadir, Morocco in 1960. 
> > > > > > > Years
> > > > > > > later, working in a tall office building in downtown L.A., I 
> > > > > > > experienced
> > > > > > > another one. It rattled windows and we could feel the whole 
> > > > > > > building
> > > > > > > swaying, but it passed without damage, and we all stood around 
> > > > > > > for a few
> > > > > > > minutes talking about it, and pretending that we hadn't just seen 
> > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > lives flash before our eyes. :-)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Talk gravitated to the other 'quakes we'd experienced. One of the
> > > > > > > programmers I'd been working on the same floor as for some time
> > > > > > > mentioned Agadir, and I was surprised so I took him aside and 
> > > > > > > followed
> > > > > > > up on it. Turns out he was originally Moroccan, forced to leave 
> > > > > > > in the
> > > > > > > Jewish diaspora several years later, and now living and working 
> > > > > > > in the
> > > > > > > US. As we chatted, we realized in a moment of mutual shock that 
> > > > > > > many,
> > > > > > > many years earlier we had sat in the same room together. It was 
> > > > > > > during a
> > > > > > > showing of the film "Exodus" on the Air Force base my parents 
> > > > > > > lived at.
> > > > > > > A lot of Jewish residents of nearby Marrakesh had gotten 
> > > > > > > permission to
> > > > > > > visit the base so that they could see the movie, which was 
> > > > > > > naturally
> > > > > > > banned from local theaters. So it turned out that this fellow and 
> > > > > > > I had
> > > > > > > been sitting in the same movie theater. Go figure.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > When I moved from California to New York, one of the things in 
> > > > > > > the back
> > > > > > > of my mind was, "Well, at least I won't have to worry about 
> > > > > > > earthquakes
> > > > > > > any more." So what happens during my first week of work on the 
> > > > > > > 40th
> > > > > > > floor of a NY office building? An earthquake. We were later told 
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > the building was measured swaying four feet back and forth; I can
> > > > > > > certainly assure you that this is exactly what it felt like, from 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > 40th floor. :-)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The thing is, the earthquake itself was in Nova Scotia. As was 
> > > > > > > explained
> > > > > > > on the News in the days that followed, the East coast of the US 
> > > > > > > is even
> > > > > > > more susceptible to damage from a major earthquake than the West 
> > > > > > > coast
> > > > > > > is. The basic infrastructure of West coast, because of the 
> > > > > > > constant
> > > > > > > grinding against each other of the tectonic plates, is more 
> > > > > > > fractured.
> > > > > > > The waves of an earthquake thus don't tend to travel very far, the
> > > > > > > energy being dissipated to some extent in the fractured ground. 
> > > > > > > But on
> > > > > > > the East coast, the ground is more solid, so the effects of a 
> > > > > > > large
> > > > > > > earthquake can travel much further -- hundreds of miles. So 
> > > > > > > Washington,
> > > > > > > D.C. was lucky. This one seems to have been localized, and in an 
> > > > > > > area
> > > > > > > that confined its effects to a small area. In Agadir, a 'quake 
> > > > > > > one point
> > > > > > > lower than this one on the Richter scale destroyed a third of the 
> > > > > > > city.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > And just to give our California dwellers pause, the Richter scale 
> > > > > > > is not
> > > > > > > the only measure. It is logarithmic, and thus illusory -- a 6.8 
> > > > > > > is 100
> > > > > > > times more powerful than a 5.8, and a 7.8 is 1000 times more 
> > > > > > > powerful.
> > > > > > > But earthquakes, where this can be measured, are also rated by the
> > > > > > > distance that the fault line itself has shifted. For example, 
> > > > > > > during the
> > > > > > > San Francisco quake that burned down major portions of the city, 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > fault line in question only shifted a few inches.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > When contemplating what the term "The Big One" could potentially 
> > > > > > > mean
> > > > > > > for California, bear in mind that they are predictable. They 
> > > > > > > occur in
> > > > > > > 150 to 200 year cycles. The last one was back during the Civil 
> > > > > > > War.
> > > > > > > During that one, the entire San Andreas fault line shifted 
> > > > > > > something
> > > > > > > like eight feet. According to historical records, it knocked 
> > > > > > > almost
> > > > > > > every existing building in California off its foundation.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Weird facts like this make me happy that I live in the Netherlands
> > > > > > > rather than California. We're pretty earthquake-free here. And 
> > > > > > > it's not
> > > > > > > as if a nation that is largely below sea level has anything to 
> > > > > > > fear from
> > > > > > > climate change and rising ocean levels. :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to