Yep, Technicolor Consciousness, that's always been my experience of it in the super-collider of the Fairfield Dome program. -Buck
"But if the Higgs doesn't exist, where does mass in the universe come from? Theories that go beyond the "standard model" of particle physics (of which the Higgs is the keystone—the one missing piece needed to explain how the universe we know came to be) may be necessary. Steven Weinberg, who in his landmark 1967 paper on the unification of the electromagnetic and the weak interactions had made key use of the Higgs for "breaking the symmetry" and separating the electromagnetic from the weak forces, has since gone beyond the standard model in his research. Weinberg has proposed a theory called Technicolor, within which the primeval symmetry of our universe can be broken through a different mechanism than the action of the elusive Higgs." --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/08/23/a-higgs-setback-did-stephen-hawking-just-win-the-most-outrageous-bet-in-physics-history/ > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > Science grows out of doubt. Religion grows out of wonder. > > > Between the two is philosophy; it has not yet decided -- > > > it goes on hanging between doubt and wonder. Sometimes > > > the philosopher doubts and sometimes the philosopher > > > wonders: he is just in between. If he doubts too much, > > > by and by he becomes a scientist. If he wonders too > > > much, by and by he becomes religious. That's why > > > philosophy is disappearing from the world -- because > > > ninety-nine percent of philosophers have become > > > scientists. And one person -- a Buber somewhere, or > > > a Krishnamurti somewhere, or a Suzuki somewhere -- > > > great minds, great penetrating intellects, they have > > > become religious. Philosophy is almost losing its ground. > > > Osho. > > > > But when/if LHC, a bit oxymoronically, "discovers" the "final > > chandas" (RSi-devataa-chandas), at least physicists are > > kinda "forced" to become religious?? > > > > http://project-cernland.web.cern.ch/project-CERNland/ > > What a bunch of arrogant, pretentious religionist crap, > both from Osho and from Card. Religion isn't about > "wonder," it's about it's opposite, certainty, or > belief in either a dogma or an inner vision caused > by believing that dogma. At least Card is honest about > what he really feels -- he wants to *force* scientists > to believe in religion. That's the whole problem with > "TM science" in a nutshell, the 'tude that "We already > know the truth, because religion has told it to us. > All we need to do now is find some way to cook the > data to make it look as if science agrees with us. > Then all those other scientists will finally have to > agree with us, because we were RIGHT all along." > > Fortunately, many scientists prefer to remain scientists, > and leave the religion to the gullible. > > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/08/23/a-higgs-setback-did-stephen-hawking-just-win-the-most-outrageous-bet-in-physics-history/ >
