From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of authfriend Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 1:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: How He Transformed The Beatles
--- In [email protected] <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <rick@...> wrote: > > On Behalf Of authfriend > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 10:39 AM > To: [email protected] <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: How He Transformed The Beatles > > > > > > --- In [email protected] <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected] <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > [Rick wrote:] > > > TM many initially have transformed the Beatles... > > [Barry wrote:] > > They were doing so badly without him, after all, > > already being the best-selling musical artists > > in history (surpassing Elvis) before they met > > him and all. :-) > [I wrote:] > Two words: White Album. > [Rick wrote:] > Which was written in India, mostly. But I think Rubber > Soul, Revolver, Sgt. Pepper, and Abbey Road were better. Lotta folks think their best material was on the White Album. (Not that the others weren't excellent.) I'm not wild about everything on the White Album, but some of the songs on it are just on a different level, IMHO, as if they came from a new place. All opinion, of course, but the best of the best, according to Ringo: the 2nd side of Abbey Road. Would have to agree.
