--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> On Aug 14, 2005, at 8:20 AM, authfriend wrote:
> 
> > But you don't seem interested in even considering
> > whether a proposed reconciliation actually makes
> > more sense than your perception of the teachings
> > not matching.
> >
> > I wonder why that would be.
> 
> Because in the comparison one is forced to conclude that TM
> represents a departure from the tradition GD taught (that is if one 
> understands what GD is saying and what he means)!

I'm afraid I can't see how your "because" is a response
to my "why."  Could I get you to try again, please?

I should think that if one's comparison suggested
that a proposed reconciliation did *not* make sense,
one would be able to address it and explain *why* it
did not make sense.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to