Fair enough - At this point, I think Ravi is sick of reading my stuff about 
him. Completely hilarious video! I wonder if the guy in it now walks around 
with a t-shirt that reads, "I licked the Pope's face"?
As for KB/Bubbles, I hope you'll contribute to the betting pool!


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bob Price <bobpriced@...> wrote:
>
> I lurked for some time before I posted, you might want to consider that 
> before questioning my choice of words. And please, don't think I don't enjoy 
> your posts, I have watched you more than once send *Bubbles* to bed for the 
> afternoon. And as I said I'm sure Raja Ravi Yogi thinks I'm nuts to include 
> you with the gang bangers. Now its time for my nails.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7Xy1nI4Wzw&feature=related
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: whynotnow7 <whynotnow7@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2011 9:11:14 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hey Ravi
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Bob, You weren't here when Ravi was putting on quite a show upon his 
> arrival on FFL. It was done brilliantly, with real links to mental hospitals, 
> doctors and psychiatrists. I was not taken in, but many others were, and it 
> was truly an alarming experience for them. After all, no one knew Ravi at 
> that point. So you may want to consider that, before calling people 
> hypocrites. 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bob Price <bobpriced@> wrote:
> >
> > I read all these posts, when they were posted. Unless you're
> > 
> > doing a Curtis; you seem to have missed my point. I do not agree with yours 
> > or
> > Alex's interpretation of your exchanges with Ravi.  I don't believe the 
> > two of you are anywhere near as innocent
> > as you'd like the other posters to believe. Alex is passive aggressive, read
> > his "projections" response to me last night.  You, on the other hand, 
> > are being
> > hypocritical; I have no reason to think it's (like Curtis), a permanent 
> > affliction,
> > or, (like Bubbles), that you're a low functioning sociopath, but your
> > explanations are BS (hope that doesn't offend). There are numerous examples 
> > of
> > Ravi's points that were completely ignored in the rush to *cyber* lynch 
> > him, I've
> > already mentioned the obvious metaphors he was using; everyone ignored his
> > explanation that one might be forgiven for thinking someone who uses a 
> > handle
> > like yours might not be offended by some colorful language; chivalry my ass,
> > you're all hypocrites. But like Watergate, or the sudden stop---to the 
> > fall, the
> > cover-up was worse than the break in. I think the posts after Ravi, and 
> > Judy,
> > posted out stink to high heaven of the basest type of mob thinking, and all 
> > of
> > you (not you Bubbles we understand your challenges) should be ashamed of
> > yourselves. *Attempting* to get even with someone by discussing their past 
> > and
> > present mental health is nasty, but pretending you're doing it out of some
> > type of concern for a fellow human being, is the worst type of hypocrisy. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy#Jung_on_the_General_Hypocrisy_of_Man
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: raunchydog <raunchydog@>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2011 5:34:40 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hey Ravi
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bob Price <bobpriced@> wrote:
> > >
> > > RD,
> > > 
> > > Since the *attempted* cyber lynching appears to be all but over, except 
> > > for the clean up, I have a couple of questions for you below; 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: raunchydog <raunchydog@>
> > > 
> > > Hi Robin, 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >>>>RD: I really don't know Ravi very well at all. I haven't read his 
> > > >>>>posts with much interest except to notice that he has had some 
> > > >>>>enjoyable back and forth banter with Denise/Emily and Bob Price. My 
> > > >>>>initial experience of Ravi was about a year ago when he got into such 
> > > >>>>a depressive state that we had extensive discussions about his mental 
> > > >>>>health and concern that he might commit suicide. Since then I see 
> > > >>>>that he has come back from the brink but rightly or wrongly, I still 
> > > >>>>see him as an unstable individual with the potential to go off the 
> > > >>>>rails again. Given his history, I think Alex's explanation for what 
> > > >>>>might have happened with Ravi in the past seems to ring true.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ***BP: Do I understand correctly that the reason you *attempted* to 
> > > provoke Ravi was your concern for his mental stability? 
> > >
> > 
> > Incorrect. I've already explained the motivation for my actions and the 
> > sequence of events here: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/297639
> > 
> > Out of respect for your friendship with Ravi, I'll answer you question. 
> > Just for the record, despite the row I've had with Ravi, I don't dislike 
> > him. Since I'm going into far more detail explaining myself than I 
> > expected, I hope you will at least follow the threads I have outlined 
> > before judging me.
> > 
> > In a nutshell: Ravi gay baited Alex. I gay baited Ravi. Ravi ranted about 
> > blowjobs. I dropped it here: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/297404
> > 
> > I thought Ravi dropped it here: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/297409
> > 
> > Then I commented on Vaj's link here: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/297443
> > 
> > Ravi took offense and for no apparent reason, he launched into another 
> > abusive rant about blowjobs here: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/297571
> > 
> > At that point Rick stepped in and I stepped back. I did not respond to 
> > Ravi's rant. In fact I'm on record saying Ravi should not be censored here: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/297765
> > 
> > I don't know anything about Ravi's mental health other than he is no longer 
> > talking about suicide. For all the reasons I explained, the notion that I 
> > provoked Ravi because I was concerned for his mental stability seems to 
> > imply cruel intent on my part and is simply not true.
> > 
> > >
> > Do I also understand correctly that the *attempted* lynching of Raja Ravi 
> > Yogi, by pretty much all of FFL (excluding Judy, Edg and Oboe) was also out 
> > of concern for his mental health;
> > >
> > 
> > I doubt it, but you'll have to ask them.
> > 
> > >
> > and we should ignore the fact that the *attempted* lynching was lead by 
> > those paragons of emotional maturity Curtis and Bubbles? 
> > >
> > 
> > Curtis can speak for himself. I note that Judy has a serious beef with him 
> > for his hypocrisy concerning Barry and Vaj then choosing to pile on Ravi. I 
> > like Curtis, but I tend to agree with her about his hypocrisy in general on 
> > the Barry/Vaj front, but that's another story. 
> > 
> > Who's Bubbles? By the way "lynching" is a bit of a loaded word for 
> > historical reasons and unfairly prejudices this discussion. 
> > 
> > >
> > In addition, the stated fact: "I really don't know Ravi very well at all." 
> > is no barrier to your meditation or an accurate diagnosis of his mental 
> > state, and further, being the trained mental health professionals that you 
> > and the Alex must so obviously be, the two of you had no doubt that 
> > provoking him was the high road to his recovery? I want to thank you for 
> > clearing that up; I'm a bit slow; I had thought it was that the two of you 
> > were being passive aggressive and working on some issues, and Ravi, as 
> > always, was more than
> > >  happy to help you out. 
> > > 
> > 
> > I get it that you want to defend Ravi. But sarcasm doesn't further, 
> > discussion. It only shows you're angry with me and would rather hurt me 
> > than give me a fair hearing. I don't know Ravi. I only know that we were 
> > concerned for his life about a year ago. I don't know his mental state now, 
> > but I can assure you, it had nothing to do with how I choose to interact 
> > with him. I'm happy he is no longer suicidal. I don't know if that was a 
> > one time event in his life or if it can happen again. Nobody knows.
> > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgKXK9giPYQ&feature=related
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >>>>Alex: "I can see why many traditions of awakening get the 
> > > >>>>samskara/vasana inner work out of the way before awakening, because 
> > > >>>>once sole identity with the I/me story is broken, it is tempting to 
> > > >>>>disregard the story as unimportant and let it act out messily. Also, 
> > > >>>>for people with serious mental health issues, nondual awakening can 
> > > >>>>make matters worse."
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ***BP: I'm sure I'm wrong about this; on the off chance Raja Ravi Yogi 
> > > was using closet and Mother Teresa as a metaphors for ignorance and 
> > > hypocrisy respectively, would it be fair to interpret yours and Alex's 
> > > posts as *attempts*, to provoke Ravi; and having the heart of a lion, in 
> > > a herd of zebras, he accommodated you?   
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, wrong, but I gotta hand to you, Bob. You're a damn good spin doctor. 
> > This quote from Alex was way after the fact. By that time, Ravi had already 
> > had two rants about blowjobs so it had nothing to do with provoking him to 
> > make those posts. IMO it's was Alex's attempt to make hindsight sense of 
> > Ravi's abusive behavior. I don't know if it exactly fits Ravi, but I 
> > wouldn't say it's not possible. 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/297682
> > 
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLFi9Xd7yys
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >>>>RDOG: As long as Ravi isn't threatening to do himself in, I don't 
> > > >>>>make any claims to know the nature of his present mental stability. 
> > > >>>>I'm just circumspect about it.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ***BP: Since most of us didn't know Raja Ravi Yogi was attempting to off 
> > > himself (including Ravi) the fact that you and the Alex have his back, 
> > > will make all of us rest much easier.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l81W-jcOuj0
> > > 
> > 
> > I'm fairly certain it was Ravi who had an emotional meltdown. If it was 
> > someone else, I'm truly sorry if I am mistaken. As I recall Ravi's meltdown 
> > was soon after Rick interviewed him for BATGAP. If anyone can find a 
> > timeline for this, I'd like to see it. Given Ravi's penchant for playing 
> > tricks, perhaps he was perfectly fine all along and he was just jerking our 
> > chain. If that's the case, he has officially disowned any responsibility 
> > for having taken advantage of our natural human response to save his life 
> > and has no appreciation for our compassion and willingness to help him in 
> > anyway we could.
> > 
> > > 
> > > >>>RDOG: Ravi claims he is enlightened. I don't know what that means to 
> > > >>>him or to anyone else. We all have a POV about it. Maybe I'm 
> > > >>>misjudging him, or just plain don't understand him but I get the 
> > > >>>feeling that he thinks his enlightenment gives him a pass to be Mr. 
> > > >>>Natural of inhibitions. I don't know if anyone's perception of him as 
> > > >>>enlightened has any bearing on how they choose to interact with him. 
> > > >>>Regardless, IMO it shouldn't be an excuse to treat him with deference 
> > > >>>or give him a pass if he chooses to be an asshole.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ***BP: This one caught my attention as it seems to be going viral (think 
> > > recent posts from Rick, Curtis and Bubbles), is there any training needed 
> > > to be able to measure another persons state of consciousness, or 
> > > motivation, for that matter? If so, I'm thinking we need an inspector 
> > > certification to avoid people running around making claims that cannot be 
> > > substantiated (you know, things like: I was just kidding; he over 
> > > reacted, because my feelings are hurt---that sort of thing); I'm thinking 
> > > ISO 666 would be catchy, since most of 9000 is gone. We could take a vote 
> > > on this, much like the recent *attempted* lynching (sorry, I meant vote) 
> > > on Raja Ravi Yogi's behavior. My vote would be that we get Rick 
> > > certified; I think that would really up the overall feel and exclusivity 
> > > of the place, cause frankly, since Judy and Ravi posted out, the place is 
> > > feeling a bit paltry. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9000
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >>>>RDOG: I don't doubt the rawness of emotion he felt when he went off 
> > > >>>>on his blow job rant. He intended to offend me. Yes, I felt offended, 
> > > >>>>not for his personal attack on me but for the stench it created in 
> > > >>>>the air on FFLife. Obviously, I provoked that in him by sending him 
> > > >>>>some fairly stinky barbs myself. Just to be clear, I don't take his 
> > > >>>>reaction to me as a lesson that I should somehow appreciate his 
> > > >>>>rancor as an opportunity to reflect upon any darkness residing in the 
> > > >>>>deepest part of my being. Perhaps this is the premise of those who 
> > > >>>>see him as a Guru. I do not. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ***BP: I'm sure I speak for many in thanking you for your concern for the 
> > > sensibilities of FFL, I was particularly concerned about Steve's wife---I 
> > > understood from his post that he was concerned that if his wife read ones 
> > > of Raja Ravi Yogi's posts she might have some kind of reaction, although 
> > > I don't think Ravi is the type of enlightened man that runs off with 
> > > another mans wife, particularly a friends---like he considers Steve. I 
> > > did have one question though; are you more concerned for my sensibilities 
> > > or Raja Ravi Yogi's mental stability?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAqmzmirixg&feature=related
> > > 
> > 
> > Ravi's mental state is his own business. It is not any concern of mine 
> > unless he threatens to kill himself, in which case I would feel compelled 
> > to do whatever I could to protect his life. But now, in light of his denial 
> > that he was suicidal, I would have to wonder if he was just jerking my 
> > chain. IMO a cruel ploy, by anyone's standards.
> > 
> > > 
> > > >>>>RDOG: I'll own my part in provoking him. I doubt that he owns his 
> > > >>>>provocative behavior when he gay-baited Alex or dismissed me as a 
> > > >>>>woman. In fact it was his stated intention to be provocative. This 
> > > >>>>whole brouhaha between Ravi and me has turned out to be quite 
> > > >>>>embarrassing in that I don't enjoy bringing attention to myself. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >>>RDOG: I like flying under the radar, posting mostly political stuff so 
> > > >>>that I can vent my frustrations about the sorry state of the state. I 
> > > >>>think it's important to be informed about current events. I try to 
> > > >>>make sense of complicated issues admittedly from a rock solid liberal 
> > > >>>POV and that may cause me to tilt at a few windmills, but so be it, at 
> > > >>>least I care about what happens to my country. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ***BP: As someone who may be the farthest to the left FFL has to offer, 
> > > I'm guessing Ravi is a 
> > > dyed in the wool progressive; that said, I believe, like me, he has 
> > > other outlets for his politics, and, he finds, pointing out what pompous 
> > > asses and hypocrites, most of us are, much more rewarding (I could be 
> > > talking my own book here). IMHO, besides any quesion of Ravi's mental 
> > > health, the biggest canards in the *attempted* lynching of Raja Ravi Yogi 
> > > are the nonsense 
> > > that Ravi is homophobic or sexist.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF0fIO4tk-g
> > > 
> > 
> > IMO Ravi gay-baited Alex. Your opinion of what constitutes sexism will 
> > obviously differ from mine. 
> > 
> > > 
> > > >>>RDOG: I don't know if anything I've said answers your doubts about 
> > > >>>dealing with Ravi effectively or if I've adequately resolved any 
> > > >>>remaining personal issues with him to your satisfaction, but it's the 
> > > >>>best that I've got for now.
> > > 
> > > >>>RDOG:Just for the record, I don't believe in censorship. It's up to 
> > > >>>Rick if he wants to boot someone off. The minimal standard on FFLife 
> > > >>>is that we don't post anything that would cause Yahoo to give us an 
> > > >>>XXX rating. In Ravi's case, he stepped over the line using abusive, 
> > > >>>pornographic language and offended the sensibilities of what a few 
> > > >>>posters feel is in good taste, but IMO Ravi's tirade didn't rise to a 
> > > >>>level that calls for censorship. Maybe there's an element of chivalry 
> > > >>>of from the guys (deep bow), but I think it's more likely they reacted 
> > > >>>to what they personally considered offensive. Vaj and Barry regularly 
> > > >>>stink up the place and we put up with it. So there's a place in the 
> > > >>>firmament of stinkers on FFLife for Ravi as well as myself. I just 
> > > >>>hope to be a better person from the experience and consider it a 
> > > >>>lesson learned for moving on.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ***BP: Again, please forgive the few of us that think, its end to end 
> > > hypocrisy, when Ravi escalates, when provoked, and FFL's lord and master 
> > > makes rules *on the fly* for the obvious purpose of making Ravi an 
> > > example when he could just as easily emailed him directly (one assumes, 
> > > like the rest of us Rick has Ravi's email), and then the class president 
> > > reappears and calls for a gang bang. I'm sure, its just me, but calling 
> > > what Vaj and Bubbles do "regularly stinking up the place" seems a touch 
> > > understated, as does trying to call the *attempted* lynching a "double 
> > > standard".  Its a good thing we have no racists on FFL or I could 
> > > go on forever. In closing, I must qualify my use of the word lynching; I 
> > > have no doubt once Raja Ravi Yogi returns we will know that the lynching 
> > > was *attempted*
> > > ---at best (so buckle up). 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZCS5I80X-8&feature=related
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  Â   
> > 
> > Oh please, are you playing the race card or saying that Ravi thinks this is 
> > about race? You're way off base on that one. After I commented on Vaj's 
> > link and thought the dust had settled, without *any* provocation, IMO Ravi 
> > lynched himself. If he hadn't made that last blowjob post and Jim hadn't 
> > asked, "WTF was that about?" I wouldn't have listed all the links making my 
> > case and no one would have noticed that Ravi had been an abusive asshole 
> > from the git go.
> > 
> > 
> >  Â Â 
> >
> 
> 
>   
>


Reply via email to