An 18-year old in California is not a minor, but is prohibited from consuming alcohol. Furnishing alcohol to someone under the age of 21 is a violation of Business & Professions Vode section 25658, a misdemeanor offense punishable by no more than one year in the county jail and a fine.
*** --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > The one you seem unfamiliar with, the real one. We protect our minors on > > this side of the ocean. > > > Is a 19 year old woman a minor ? > Weird place your California... > > > > > > "Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor" California > > > > Penal Code 272 PC > > > > "Contributing to the delinquency of a minor is a common crime for which > > thousands of people in California get prosecuted every year. > > > > The most classic scenario is an adult who gets caught supplying alcohol or > > drugs to a teenager. But as the article below explains, Penal Code 272 PC > > is actually much broader than most people realize. Parents and strangers > > alike can get prosecuted for any behavior that tends to lead a minor down a > > path towards criminality, truancy from school, or becoming a dependant of > > the juvenile court." > > > > I'm sure the arrest would go smoothly and not result in any additional > > charges for wacky erratic behavior and that his employer and contentious ex > > would be sympathetic about this matter. > > > > Oh yeah, and lets not forget this wasn't wine with dinner, this was tequila > > shots, so if she careens into a family of four on her way home, or is > > physically harmed in any way as a result of his actions, it all gets > > promoted to a felony. > > > > But don't worry Nabbie, he was just kidding and as Judy pointed out, I > > tricked him into saying all this stuff in that way only she and Robin can > > detect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Excellent push back Curtis. I feel much better. That type of spin put > > > > on by Judy and some others cannot be allowed to go uncontested. I simply > > > > cannot get dialed in to the justification that Judy (in particular) and > > > > others feel they need to provide to Ravi. I am in total agreement with > > > > your analysis. Of course Ravi interacted with that 19 year old as he > > > > described. And you know what, who cares. > > > > > > > > > Curtis got all excited because Ravi gave a drink to this girl of 19, > > > claiming she is underaged. In my world she is a woman. What kind of weird > > > world is he living in ? > > > > > >
