Emotional buttons are not real buttons, it is just a term to describe a 
person's conditioned responses to a situation. We all have conditioned 
responses; some hard-wired, other learned. Our nervous systems are stimulus 
response machines. These conditioned responses have an intellectual component, 
and an emotional component. It is the emotional component that causes us 
problems in interpreting what is going on if a conditioned response is in play. 
The trick is to realise that one of these 'buttons' in us has been pushed and 
to notice what is happening, it is just a process of being more aware. This 
helps to dissolve or lessen the conditioned response.

This is basically a process of accommodation which refers to part of the 
adaptation process. The process of accommodation involves altering one's 
existing schemas, or ideas, as a result of new information or new experiences. 
You must accommodate this new learning in order to ensure that what's inside 
your head conforms to what's outside in the real world.

This requires one step back from one's own reaction, at least partially, 
without getting sucked in whole hog. For practice you can watch a newscaster 
whose views you despise, or listen to speeches by a candidate who is in a party 
different from yours. 

Button pushing happens when we get challenged. Barry and Curtis are good 
vehicles for this because they have an independence of thought that on this 
forum at least, is not universally popular. And Barry seems to have developed 
an additional career as a professional button tester. In order to get one's 
button's pushed, it is not necessary that the stimulus be true or false, it 
just has to trigger the conditioned response.

--- In [email protected], Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote:
>
> Speaking of dramatic, Barry's titles usually speak for themselves.  My 
> perception was that Ann used "lethal" in a literary context to describe 
> Curtis's ability to creatively, dramatically, and incisively "skewer" said 
> recipients he feels a perceived slight from, when he chooses - astute fellow 
> that he is described as.  Curtis, you are a creative writer, no doubt. The 
> "power of words" in play....  
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: authfriend <jstein@...>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2012 8:09 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] ANOTHER DEATH THREAT (was Re: Fat, old drama 
> queens...)
>  
> 
>   
> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> <snip>
> > And I think that both Ann and Judy are doing the same thing 
> > on FFL, and that few other than Curtis, myself, and AZ are 
> > calling them on it. There was never any "death threat." 
> > Curtis's words were just words, not "lethal." And the 
> > histionics of a couple of women whose aversions cause them 
> > to get their emotional buttons pushed rather easily are 
> > never going to make any of these claims any less histrionic, 
> > or true.
> 
> Barry always has been metaphorically challenged. He thinks
> the people here he doesn't like (mostly women) have real
> buttons.
>


Reply via email to