I should add for the record that I had no intention of
suggesting that you or Ann have ever sacrificed your
integrity in exchanges with Barry or Curtis.

--- In [email protected], Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote:
>
> Judy's point is actually a very interesting discussion that I have done some 
> thought about, but will think about some more and respond to.  
> 
> Xeno, you are by no means a dimwit, but I said "duh" in the same place Judy 
> did.  And I laughed, because I remembered you responded so respectfully to 
> my post that "men and women are different for hormonal reasons"..."<duh> on 
> that as well :)
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius <anartaxius@...>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2012 2:18 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] ANOTHER DEATH THREAT (was Re: Fat, old drama 
> queens...)
>  
> 
>   
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
> > <anartaxius@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > Emily, (and Ann) seem to have the capacity to actually
> > > converse with Barry and Curtis on some points, and it
> > > would be a shame if they lost that capability by becoming
> > > more reactionary or antagonistic, regardless of how
> > > antagonistic Curtis or Barry might seem. That requires
> > > they transcend their psychological 'buttons'. You cannot
> > > soften these guys up emotionally, you need to find
> > > another approach.
> > 
> > There is no way to "soften up" Barry or Curtis except
> > by acquiescing in their dishonesty and thus losing one's
> > own integrity.
> 
> The key here is what integrity is construed to be. I am going to assume, 
> without proof that we would disagree on this. Let me make a guess, which if 
> wrong, I will admit:
> 
> I would pick the second of these two definitions for myself, but I sense you 
> would pick the first for yourself, or pick both; in my estimation, your 
> actions seem to speak for the first definition as being dominant.
> 
> 1. Adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; 
> honesty.
> 
> 2. The state of being whole, entire, or undiminished:
>


Reply via email to