I am speaking words and you are hearing different ones.
THe most interesting research on TM has all been published since 1980. If evaluations of the "significance" of EEG results during TM don't look at the papers published in the last 30+ years, well, it is obvious that they are based on 30 year old research, now isn't it? L. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Apr 24, 2012, at 8:24 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:50 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > > > > > Sez who? Someone citing an evaluation of TM research from 30 years ago. > > > > > > > > > Barbara Brown was the person who popularized the use of EEG in the > > > biofeedback movement. In fact, I believe she actually started the use of > > > the word biofeedback... > > > > > > > And? > > > > I was referring to your claim that the TM EEG was of no consequence. > > > > It doesn't matter who said it. What matters is what they are basing their > > evaluation on. > > > Typically they�re basing it in comparison to year of clinical experience > and years of experience measuring the greatest contemplatives in numerous > different traditions. >
