--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Siddhi means perfection. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/siddhi?s=t
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > LOL.
> > > > 
> > > > You're going by an online English dictionary's definition of a 
> > > > technical Sanskrit term?
> > > 
> > >  
> > > Technical term interpreted for you by who? The guy who told
> > > you you could fly?
> > > 
> > > Besides that isn't really the only definition I could find
> > > just the one most suited to an emial discussion. I could
> > > photograph someothers or scan them and post if you like?
> > > 
> > 
> > http://dictionary.babylon.com/siddhi/
> > 
> > 
> > several different definitions.
> 
> Whatever, I remember the lectures and can't help noticing
> it all came to nought.

Except the part  about creating a situation where some of the physiological 
correlates of pure consciousness appear simultaneously with higher levels of 
brain activation, the purported purpose of practicing the techniques in the 
first place.


> 
> 
> > The TM research that everyone likes to malign shows very clearly that TM is 
> > twice as effective as other forms of meditation and relaxation at 
> > addressing anxiety. While many people like to point at the meta-analyses 
> > that say that TM research sucks, they miss the important point that 
> > according to those same meta-analyses, ALL meditation research, without 
> > fail, sucks.
> > > 
> > > Probably because it's an old type of coping mechanism,
> > > pleasant to do but not worth the effort compared to
> > > other techniques of self development if you have a particular
> > > complaint to address.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > Or not. THe studies the US military are conducting will provide some pretty 
> > interesting data points.
> 
> Or not. Still wont change my experience from actually knowing
> many people who have done it for many years and aren't exactly
> the best adverts.

As I said, a stress reduction technique may not touch symptoms if they don't 
have anything to do with stress.

> 
> > > THis includes the most recent studies on mindfulness published in the 
> > > past few days, weeks, months, etc, because those analyses claim that 
> > > unless you use a true double-blind study performed by only by researchers 
> > > who  have no attachment to the techniques being tested, the study is 
> > > pretty  much worthless.
> > > 
> > > I'm not tub thumping for anything other than common sense.
> > > 
> > 
> > Common sense is neither, as the saying goes, and common sense doesn't 
> > predict highly unusual events, by definition.
> 
> Highly unusual things like flying unaided or seeing through
> walls?
>

Or staring at goats, or having a single wave form appear on more than a dozen 
widely spaced electrodes simultaneously, or...


L


Reply via email to