Just kind of curious Barry. Science as far as I know does not examine the notion of breath, or prana, and the different types of pranas.
And yet eastern literature discusses prana and the different types of prana quite a bit, and often authoritatively. Because science, or at least western science has not considered this, would you consider what has been said about prana to be "hooey"? For me, I am not ready to let science yet be the final arbiter of reality. Certainly I have great faith in science. But I'm also not afraid of trusting my own experiences, even if they run counter to the science of the day. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > > > > I've continued my TM Sidhi practice and added healing modalities > > such as EFT tapping. I actually think TM helps me make wiser > > decisions concerning such. > > No personal offense meant, but this is just priceless. > > Can you imagine trying to explain to 99% percent of the > people on this planet what *either* the TM Sidhis *or* > EFT Tapping are, and while doing so using the phrase > "wiser decisions" and keeping a straight face? > > :-) > > Don't get me wrong. Both have their cadre of believers. > Both -- for all I know -- have benefit. But most people > on the planet are going to bag them as New Age Hooey and, > from the standpoint of real science, both are. > > But there's no accounting for belief, just as there is > no accounting for taste. It's as individual as there are > individuals, and that's the way it should be. > > I say, "Carry on with whatever delusions make you happy." > > I say this to the scientists, too. :-) >
