<snip> "You would think, given that Robin has so radically rejected> TM, that they'd want to make common cause with him."
You are correct, it's not Maharishi that he's rejected, it's TM. The second quote is a testament from Robin that he is committed to seeing where the conversation evolves to. ________________________________ From: authfriend <jst...@panix.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 3:52 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Robin Carlsen Story Not sure what your point here is, Emily. Rather than have me guess, could you give me a clue? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote: > > <snip> You would think, given that Robin has so radically rejectedTM, that > they'd want to make common cause with him. > > Robin quotes:  > > > "I still experience that there is almost as much Maharishi inside of me as > there is me. I don't like it; but that is the consequence of the awesome > change he wrought in me. I believe I would be one-half the person I am now > able to be if it were not for meeting Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and coming under > the tremendous metaphysical integrity of his personality and his > consciousness." > > "Secondly, I am not a doctrinaireâ€"at least in the sense that I would ever > allow what I believed in to spare me the existential tension, dissonance, > ordeal of perhaps realizing, in contemplating I could be wrong in those > beliefs ("wrong" here means: they do not correspond with reality), that > someone elseâ€"even empty billâ€"is right." > > > ________________________________ > From: authfriend <jstein@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 1:23 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Robin Carlsen Story > > >  > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > So Vaj moved from the unpleasant pedophile analogy to a quite > > different accusation of criminality, all within a few hours! > > As I understand it, he was barred legally from entering > Jefferson County--I assume that's still in effect, not > sure--but it had nothing to do with criminality; it was > part of the outcome of MIU's lawsuit against him back in > 1983. > > > My, oh, my, some people's hatred runs so deep it knows no > > bounds of decorum or decency. > > And Vaj isn't willing to say why he hates Robin so much. > > > I have never had the impression that Robin is "targeting" > > anyone. > > Of course he isn't. Targeting them for what? Why? > > Vaj knows that's nonsense, but he's hoping others don't. > He wants to make folks leery of talking to Robin. > > > He is working out some ideas and exchanging them with people > > who are willing to debate or simply chat with him. That's > > really the purpose of this forum, is it not? > > Exactly. > > > I like Robin. I think he is a good guy. > > Why he makes a few people here freak out is a mystery to me. > But interestingly, it's the same few people who are in the > habit of making this forum unpleasant for the TMers here. > You would think, given that Robin has so radically rejected > TM, that they'd want to make common cause with him. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > But what one doesn't expect is a cult leader, who leaves Neo-Vedism > > > > and joins...the Catholic church...only to later re-target his old > > > > audience...as they're probably the only ones interested in > > > > listening....via email. > > > > > > > > Let's keep in mind, if this person were to set foot in Jefferson > > > > County, he'd be thrown into jail, no? So if you can't go to > > > > Fairfield you use email to get to your audience. I mean that has > > > > to be a first in and of itself: Fairfield guru using email lists > > > > to gain that lost adulation! > > > > > > This is bullshit, deliberate, vicious, thoroughly malicious > > > bullshit. It's not meant as a joke, it's meant to do harm. > > > > > > Vaj is the kind of person who gets his kicks out of harming > > > people. > > > > > >