--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > It's not the fact that he is just dead.
Did Nabbie just change his handle here? > > You yourself have no honesty and integrity to question him - that man is at> > least dead, you are alive.> So you were hoping to argue with me about my opinions about a man you didn't know did ya? And you were thinking it might be inappropriate for me to voice opinions about him on a board devoted to those issues. Got it, I'm sure that all makes perfect sense in crazy world. > > Just wake up and take care of yourself, rather than your fixation on him. > What moral, ethical, spiritual principles you have - you can continue your > fixations, fantasies on Maharishi but don't expect you not being called on > it every time you do that. Yeah, well this is a TM and ex TM focused forum so you are gunna get some talk about the guy I would think. And I wasn't challenged on anything I said, it was just a general insult post like yours. I would welcome someone to challenge the meaning of what I wrote. > > Prove us you are not Maitreya of Morons here, you are rehabilitating, good > we all applaud it. The Morons who parade their emotionally demented, > deranged, depraved misogynist, homophobic nonsense here day in and day out, > abusing and taunting others from posting here, their 17 year old paranoid, > delusional, narcissistic fantasies. Yeah, the judge got that one right. You yourself had the the temerity to > brand Judy as being full of malice, of trying to slander you, man the gall, > arrogance and the stupidity. I get it that this site is a soap opera vehicle for your own personal frustrations, but Judy has nothing to do with this exchange. If you are trying to insert yourself into long forgotten exchanges I had with her in the past you are being trollish, trying to get two other people to fight who have no current beef with each other. Now I see that with no TM background all you have to do here is shoot spitballs and hope they will get you noticed, but you aren't gunna get much traction on the train of "don't talk about Maharishi here". > > I feel pity for your ass.> No you don't. You feel resentment for your own personal life and you are trying to take that aggression out on strangers here, inserting yourself into conversations between people with actual skin in the game. I may disagree with Nabbie but he knew Maharishi and has earned his opinion about him as I have. You are just a troll looking for a fight about topics you know nothing about while hoping that by interjecting yourself into the personalities of the posters here you wont stick out so much. You are a tumbleweed of unfocused unpleasantness blowing through this group till you completely lose it and get booted off. Again. > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:26 PM, curtisdeltablues < > curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > Thanks for verifying the triplets MMY story Nabbie, I was just guessing. > > What course was that on? > > > > I am curious about this arbitrary fixation on his deadness. I thought you > > guys believed that he is still with us somewhere between Marley's ghost and > > the thought in meditation that inspires the marketing crew to try some new > > scheme to get TM into the lives beyond the 687 people who still practice it > > exclusively now. > > > > So you think a guy like Maharishi actually dies? And how do you imagine my > > "bashing" affects him? Is it like a disturbance in sleep like when someone > > in the bed farts and we almost wake up and then turn over? Or does it > > really get to him, do my words cause him to gnash his teeth and pound his > > fist into his hands in a Sienfeldesque "CURTIS!" Does he shake his fist at > > the sky like Jon Stewart and curse me from beyond the grave? Does he try to > > extract retribution on me in this world to get me back in some way like > > moving a chair when I sleep so I stub my toe during a mid-sleep groggy > > bathroom run? Exactly how pissed do my words make this spirit of Maharishi > > you imagine? Should I invest in a voodoo doll of him to avoid his evil eye? > > > > Now of course if your point was that when I posted the same perspective > > when he was alive he had a chance to challenge what I said directly, I > > would agree. I think we are both glad that he took so many opportunities to > > give his side here while he was living, and I do miss those exchanges. > > > > And how far does this ban about speaking ill of the dead extend Nabbie. Do > > we include Napoleon, Sun Myng Moon, John Lennon? What is the key aspect of > > the unfairness you seem to resent about it all? > > > > What if we have a public figure who is so boring that he might as well be > > dead like King Tony? Do I have to include him in the don't speak about the > > dead ban. Should we just ban all histories of famous dead people if the > > perspective isn't only positive? > > > > Or was this whole thing just a protective instinct, misguided though I > > believe it to be, to protect the magical illusions he tried to sell us all > > about himself during his life? > > > > Oh shit I have a fleck of dust in my eye...hey wait a minute...wasn't he a > > pile of dust the last time we saw him... > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > Who would > > wish that on anybody? > > > > > > > > > Ravi was right ofcourse, it didn't take long before the hillbilly-singer > > was back where he left us last time and where he's feeling most > > comfortable: Maharishi-bashing. > > > If all else fails in life it's great to have someone to bash, > > particularily someone who's dead, don't you think ? > > > > > > > > > >
