--- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...> wrote:
> Amazing, how Curtis managed to turn things around so that that Emily, the > aggrieved party who Sal dumped on in a private email, is now Emily the > instigator of a nefarious plot to sic Judy on poor Curtis. Pretty slick, I'd > say. Hey thanks for standing up to Judy for calling me dishonest... oh wait, sorry I just read that again. Actually I thought it was to sick Judy on Sal who Emily knows hates Sal. She wasn't only calling me dishonest, she was insinuating without proof that Sal's email was somehow more egregious the how I described it. I was just bonus entertainment. I was trying to balance out a post by Dr. Dummass that was calling Sal crazy since I had actually read the email and the good Dr had not. I haven't been paying much attention is Dr. and old FFL poster with a new name? That was a curiously inside comment from what was posted about the exchange. I suspect a bit of contrived innocence in that post. Dr. Do you have history with Sal? > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > DD: "Sal Sunshine": sounds like a crazy, invasive personality to me. > > > > > > > > I believe she has some sincere concerns about some of the > > > > posters here. She was on the FFL for years and I knew her > > > > personally, and never felt she was either of those things. > > > > She was sticking up for me and I appreciate that. She was > > > > expressing an opinion like we do here all the time. > > > > > > You read her email, Curtis. That is not an honest description > > > of it. > > > > That was a concise lesson in Judy ethics and hypocrisy wasn't it? > > > > Right on the heels of accusing me of being unethical for stating that > > Robin's parody he wrote with my name on the bottom misrepresented my views. > > In this case everyone could read his post and my views to make their own > > determination... > > > > she accuses me of lying about an email that was sent to her even though she > > was not mentioned in the email and the subject had nothing to do with her. > > > > So she accused me of being dishonest and knows that I can't post the email > > to counter the charge. My bet is that she hoped that this would force me > > to. It will not. > > > > And one wonders what aspect of what I said she could possibly attack even > > as even expressing a different POV,let alone being dishonest? > > > > That it was Sal's opinion? > > > > That it expressed concern about some people online? > > > > That she was sticking up for me in the email? > > > > > > You are slithery creature Judy. And this outcome is exactly why Emily put > > this email into your talons. > > > > Amazing, how Curtis managed to turn things around so that that Emily, the > aggrieved party who Sal dumped on in a private email, is now Emily the > instigator of a nefarious plot to sic Judy on poor Curtis. Pretty slick, I'd > say. > > > Then Judy suggested that I sent the email to more people who were not > > mentioned and had nothing to do with it. > > > > Yea, this post is pretty much all anyone would need to know about her. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone can take their email off the yahoo group list so that no one can > > > > send you a private email. If you have it on there you might get one > > > > someday, I know I do. Is it a bigger deal than bringing out an opinion > > > > in front of everyone? That judgement may be different for each of us. > > > > I would actually prefer to get that kind of email privately and miss > > > > all the piling on that can go on here. YMMV. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I concur that online and offline are different beasts. I do > > > > > > > take greater license online in stretching the boundaries than > > > > > > > I would offline. I received a very unpleasant private email > > > > > > > yesterday from Sal Sunshine telling me to BUTT OUT of the > > > > > > > dialogue between Robin and Curtis. > > > > > > > > > > > > Emily is not exaggerating. It was an *astoundingly* > > > > > > unpleasant email, one that nobody here, including > > > > > > Sal's most dedicated supporters, could fail to > > > > > > recognize as such. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
