--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > So Emily and I are cool now. Have fun with > > > > whatever this thing is that seems to interest you. > > > > > > Have fun believing that you and Emily are cool now. > > > > I'm pretty sure that if you play the song "Imagine" > > backwards, it generates one of your posts. > > > You may be cool with Emily, Curtis, but I doubt she's > cool with you. After calling her motives into question > so brutally, do you really think she trusts you? Just > curious...
There's a number of things Curtis can't change. 1. He can't change the ugly email Sal wrote Emily accusing her of being mean to him. 2. He can't change the fact that he then defended Sal on FFL. 3. He can't change the fact that he tried to make Sal's email sound like no big deal. 4. He can't change the fact that he accused Emily of sending me Sal's email to foment a public fight, after Emily had explicitly explained otherwise. Why *would* Emily want to be "cool" with Curtis in light of those facts? Nor can Curtis change the fact that I've also read Sal's email. Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?). If he had not defended Sal, if he had acknowledged the ugliness of Sal's email, if he hadn't attributed ulterior motives to Emily for sending me the email, he wouldn't be out of favor with Emily, and folks on FFL wouldn't be wondering about his integrity. If one of my supporters had written a nasty email to someone viciously castigating them for purportedly putting me down, and I found out about it, I'd call the emailer out on FFL by name. Curtis *definitely* doesn't have the integrity to do that. > When Emily played off Robin's irony email did you think > she was teasing you or did it piss you off? Was your > poor treatment of her pay back for a bruised ego or did > it have nothing to do with this: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319723 Good question. But if he deigns to respond to it, will we have any reason to trust what he tells us? Will Emily?
