--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], awoelflebater <no_reply@> wrote: > > > Curtis, you may be correct in all that you say. I am > > getting impressions from people who read the email that > > Sal sent that it was not a pleasant email to receive > > for Emily. Emily has said so and Judy has said so, both > > of whom read the letter. > > M: I am not denying that, I was objecting to the histrionic > characterization Judy was trying to use to create a fuss > that you bought into.
Which "histrionic characterization" of mine was Ann buying into, Curtis? Not only did I not use the characterization Ann did, I noted explicitly that it was inaccurate. But Curtis has just gone too far now; he can't stop himself from lying even if there's no question he'll be exposed. > A:So I am going to back out now that I have put in my two > cents regarding the conclusion I drew from all of the to-ing > and fro-ing on this subject. I am going to back out because > I did not read the email and thus can not comment further on > it. However, I can and did want to say what I said regarding > the general play of personalities and human nature as I saw it > based on discussions of this issue. > > M: It clarified a bias I was unaware of. Translation: Curtis does not agree with Ann's opinions, therefore they constitute a "bias." > A: At this point, if Sal is all she is cracked up to be by > those who love and support her, it would be about that time > when she could step out from behind that curtain and say her > lines. > > M: Slow news day huh? I think all the actual participants > are all fine at this point. Thanks for your concern. Emily isn't fine. Curtis is lying up a storm, so clearly he isn't so fine either. Sal has *never* been fine. At least not since she joined FFL.
