--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  
> In a message dated 9/1/05 6:51:57 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> In 2001,  FEMA warned that a hurricane striking New
> Orleans was one of the three most  likely disasters in
> the U.S. But the Bush administration cut New  Orleans
> flood control funding by 44 percent to pay for the
> Iraq  war.
> 
> 
> 
> Ahem, what kept the city of New Orleans and the State of  Louisiana 
from 
> shoring up their own levee problem? Was it finances? Or was it  
something else. If 
> it was finances, the city or the state could have easily  passed a 
Hotel and 
> car rental tax to finance such infrastructure changes and  have the 
tourist 
> pay for it. Lack of federal funding is a cop out. I've heard  there 
were more 
> logistical reasons for not building the levees to be able to  
withstand more 
> than a category three hurricane. The decisions were local, not  
federal.

Not according to the articles Judy has been posting. Perhaps you 
would post your own articles explaining why the ones she has posted 
are wrong?





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to