On 9/2/05 11:35 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again the federal government did fund the project. It never intended to fund
> it 100%. And when federal funding was cut by 44% it was up to the state and
> local governments to make up the difference and they could have, they chose
> not to. What you are proposing is the city and state refuse to take any
> responsibility for their own protection and demand the federal government do
> it all and if they don't we'll make you pay for the mess should one occur.
> That's called blackmail. It's like a person holding a gun to his head
> demanding favors.
Perhaps "learned helplessness" can be transferred to city governments?
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
