--- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> > > wrote: > > > Judy backs up her ideas with facts that she doesn't make up. Her > > forthright style of presenting posts in evidence of your own words in > > the archives is perhaps emotionally unsettling, a "trigger" making you > > feel defensive but it doesn't negate the truth of what she says or what > > you have written. Rather than lash out at Judy ineffectually, deal with > > your "triggers" and deal with the reality of what she says, not as a > > victim but as an equally intelligent adult. If you want to make a case > > against her you cannot do this successfully if the starting point of > > your defense is based on fantasy. > > > > As the wise woman said: > > > > I hope you're not saying that *your* and your support group's reality is > > the one > > closest to the truth and that there's a need in you and in your support > > group to > > convince others to accept this. That would be proselytizing, wouldn't > > it? If > > *that's* the case, then perhaps you and I have nothing to discuss > > because we are > > never going to see eye to eye. I'm hoping that *isn't* the case. > > > > http://youtu.be/CI8UPHMzZm8
This is a brilliant post, raunchy. And it says everything I could ever think of saying. I think the deer crossing signs should definitely be taken down--or moved to a more suitable place--putting them at a school crossing seemed like a good idea to me.
