--- In [email protected], "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@> > > wrote: ><snip> > > > I hope you're not saying that *your* and your support group's > > > reality is the one closest to the truth and that there's a > > > need in you and in your support group to convince others to > > > accept this. That would be proselytizing, wouldn't it? If > > > *that's* the case, then perhaps you and I have nothing to > > > discuss because we are never going to see eye to eye. I'm > > > hoping that *isn't* the case. > > > > http://youtu.be/CI8UPHMzZm8 > > This is a brilliant post, raunchy. And it says everything I > could ever think of saying. > > I think the deer crossing signs should definitely be taken > down--or moved to a more suitable place--putting them at a > school crossing seemed like a good idea to me.
But until the deer get used to the new crossings, they need to put up signs saying, e.g., "No Deer Crossing Here. Nearest Crossing at XXX Elementary School in West Bumfield." Otherwise the deer are going to be very confused.
