Okay Ravi, since you have accused me of slander, I will post your statement. Then advise if you wish to withdraw the charge of slander.
One correction: The post was made on Batgap, not FFL >From Batgap: Post 4466, Sunday May 16, 2010, 2:11 am Now she has her complete attention on me because of my energy..:-). I told her that she had to stop treating Amma as her guru and that I would be her Guru from today and she completely, innocently, with complete faith accepted it and I made her repeat it 3 times - "I reject Amma and accept Ravi as my Guru"..LOL.. Oh what a woman !!! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > Steve baby - this is an example of why you are branded as an idiot. You can't even come up with something clever, pertinent, original, inventive, intelligent even while indulging in slander. > > > On Dec 7, 2012, at 7:17 PM, "seventhray1" lurkernomore20002000@... wrote: > > > Share, > > > > Always consider the source. As Ravi has said, much of his dysfunctionality is a matter of the public record, except for those posts (a considerable amount) he has managed to have expunged. > > > > He is on the record here, saying that he issued an ultimatum to his wife that she renounce Amma as her guru and instead accept him as her guru. > > > > So, as I've said, consider the source. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: > > > > > > Share - I have to add, your posts to this thread have hilarious in their > > > utter clueless-ness. > > > > > > You are not a person who has, so far shown any awareness, sensitivity, > > > maturity - intellectual and/or emotional, intelligence to understand the > > > nuances of any issue to be really compassionate. There is a difference > > > between fake niceness and genuine compassion - in the absence of above your > > > responses to Robin's posts come across as hilarious or malicious depending > > > on my mood. > > > > > > I would say you are very much like Barry except he is overtly mean and you > > > are not. Anyway I don't know what the sound of two paranoid, delusional > > > people conversing is - I don't think it's possible, they are too..well > > > paranoid and alike to get along with each other. So you are better off > > > spending your time on FFL chatting to people like LG, Xeno and others if > > > you don't want people to pile on you. > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:34 PM, authfriend authfriend@ wrote: > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Judy, whatever the quality of Robin's intentions, they > > > > > would have been under the influence of his self proclaimed > > > > > state of mystical hallucination. Your ignoring, in relation > > > > > to his intentions, that self proclamation of his > > > > > > > > Of course, I don't "ignore" it. You say that without having > > > > any idea of how I view this: You just made it up. Typical. > > > > > > > > I *disagree* that Robin's intentions would have been affected, > > > > made somehow negative, by his enlightenment. I see no reason > > > > why that would have been the case. > > > > > > > > You are taking "delusion" and "hallucination" too literally; > > > > those terms are only very roughly approximate, because there > > > > simply is no vocabulary to describe what happened to him. > > > > > > > > He himself has said his enlightenment was *real*, so there's > > > > obviously a paradoxical element to this that you haven't > > > > bothered to take into account. > > > > > > > > > > > > > perpetuates > > > > > an aspect of hallucination into the PRESENT and is not IMO > > > > > helpful in the present. This is what I am addressing, the > > > > > present. > > > > > > > > Yes, I know you are. Your sole interest is in finding ways > > > > to portray him negatively *in the present*, and you'll make > > > > up whatever metaphysical "rules" you need to in order to do > > > > that. > > > > > > > > Your "perpetuate an aspect of hallucination into the > > > > PRESENT" doesn't make any sense. *You* don't even know what > > > > you mean by it. > > > > > > > > You have a desperate need to make Robin a Bad Guy to justify > > > > the disgusting way you've behaved toward him. > > > > > > > > I stand by what I said. The negative intelligences that > > > > brought about Robin's enlightenment *used* his good > > > > intentions--and those of everyone in his group--to further > > > > their own goals. That did not turn them into *bad* > > > > intentions. The bad intentions were those of the negative > > > > intelligences that took advantage of his innocence, his > > > > idealism, his loving nature, his desire to help others > > > > be the best they could possibly be. > > > > > > > > > > > > Though I recognize that I've made some mistakes > > > > > about all this and will probably do so again, I will > > > > > continue to address issues if I think it is helpful to do > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > Robin is a good and honorable man who treated you with > > > > fairness, respect, and compassion even after you turned > > > > on him. > > > > > > > > You can do nothing "helpful" where Robin is concerned other > > > > than wake up, smell the coffee, and acknowledge how > > > > appallingly badly and dishonestly you've treated him due > > > > to your inability to face your own weaknesses. If you are > > > > incapable of dealing with that reality, just keep your > > > > poisonous trap shut about him. > > > > > > > > You are the most toxic personality I have ever encountered. > > > > You make my skin crawl. > > > > > > > > And I notice you slithered away from responding to my > > > > question: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the whole situation became confusing, agonizing and > > > > > > eventually poignant. Even more reason to immediately name > > > > > > the hallucination or delusion or pragyaparadh when it > > > > > > appears so that unnecessary suffering can be avoided. > > > > > > > > > > And what is it that will do this "naming" for us, Share? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
