Salyavin: Your post becomes the test of my WC1--and I really mean that. Can I respond to what you have said sincerely without contacting the existential tensions so familiar to my pre-WC1, tensions which would make me (out of a mistaken notion of love of truth) say something to challenge you--But when I reread my post here to you, all I see is ignorance. And I realize that in some oblique way the Personal God was speaking to me via yourself.
So, I am just seeing if reality (in the form of your post) can take me out of WC1--and so far I seem to be maintaining that state of consciousness quite perfectly. You see what it means, Salyavin: It means letting you exist without the benefit of my creatively ignorant prior self. I cannot be your saviour, then--but I know now this is good for both of us. I never was that confident that I would bring about some change in which would make you a more beautiful person. But you see, now I realize: It's none of my damn business. To be delivered from my role as would-be objectifier of first person ontology; you cannot know what a relief it is. The only downside is that I shall be taking your advice at the end of your post: God showed me that no one gave a shit about anything I cared about--and in the end I think this may just have spurred (Maharishi word) my entrance into WC1. I can't tell you how wonderful this state of consciousness is--And I believe the only way I can prove it to the readers and posters at FFL is 1 Never be argumentative 2. Never use irony. Well, I have just passed my first test, I think. I will always feel differently about England after this. Robin --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote: > > > > Salyavin: > > > > Are you by any chance a clinical psychologist? You conduct psychotherapy? > > The only reason i ask is because of the thoughtful and complex reflections > > you share with us here on FFL--I am referring especially to your remarks > > about people. They are certainly sensitive and wise. > > I told you Robin, I have a gift for summing things up. What you > don't see are the thoughtful and complex reflections that go into > my remarks. Or do I just shoot my mouth off when I see another > tedious attempt to kick start a defunct argument? Which is closer > to truth, better to think or better just to act? I think that no-one > really thinks but we just have spontaneous thoughts and then act and attempt > to justify them later. Hmmm, I must have thought about that > at some point..... > > > > You were dead wrong about AWB--as your subsequently communication with her > > proved. (Although you would never acknowledge this.) > > Anne is, like most people on here I should think, most likely a very > pleasant person when you get to know her. Doesn't mean I'm not too because > I'm an asshole occasionally, or you or anyone. > > > > This is classic Salyavin--and it is one of those impulses of yours which > > did not travel through the more subtle parts of your brain. > > Yeah, I am a class act.... > > > I knew you would like that. > > > > Life will never ask you to bear anymore reality than you can, Salyavin. > > And I'm guessing you think that reading and inwardly obsessing > on every post about Share said this and Robin said that will > teach me something about reality that I don't already know? > > > But this, this was a beaut. > > > > Thanks. > > No worries mate, normally I wouldn't bother even reading as > far as I did but you do go on and keep digging up the rubbish > that - I can promise you - no-one else gives a shit about. But > you can if that's your bag. > > > > > Robin >
