Went to MIU with Tom. We had fun, but I probably did not have much fun as Tom. 
You can take that one to the bank!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> Tom & Jeannie? Yep, that's where I'm from.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I guess I make too many snap judgements.  But thanks for the
> > clarification.
> > Did you say you were from the N.C. area?  A good (old) friend of mine
> > appears quite active in the TMO down there.  I haven't spoken with him
> > for over 20 years, but I see he and his wife are carrying the torch
> > there.
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Some good thoughts in your list Steve...how many nights did you say
> > that you couldn't sleep? BTW, my beer should be corrected as follows:
> > >
> > > Laughinggull – Is it really beer *he* is brewing, or just a fizzy,
> > sparkling beverage? The jury is out on that, but it always tickles the
> > insides.
> > >
> > > LOL...I guess my feminine side is coming through here at FFL. Now it
> > makes sense, Steve, when you highlighted a line from one of my posts,
> > and wrote something like: "What the woman said." Kinda elevates your
> > comment some time ago: "Someone could fall in love with you based on
> > this comment alone" or somesuch.
> > >
> > > Now I'm curious as what others with whom I've interacted on this forum
> > thought I was (perhaps I should rephrase that, eh?). An interesting
> > discussion might be *how* we respond (or not) to others on an online
> > forum because of gender, and how that might *change* if someone isn't
> > the gender we think he/she is.
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Share.  I wouldn't have expected to post so much these past
> > few
> > > > months, but just worked out that way I guess.
> > > >
> > > > Here's something I came up with the other night when I couldn't
> > sleep.
> > > >
> > > > Don't mean to offend anyone, (on what's turned out to be a sad day)
> > > >
> > > >   There's been a lot of talk about craft beers here, and the other
> > > > night, having trouble sleeping I thought about what qualities of a
> > craft
> > > > bear could be compared to a posting style.  I came up with some side
> > by
> > > > side comparisons.  And as many posts contain insults, the
> > descriptions
> > > > should also be viewed as applying to insult styles as well.
> > > >
> > > > Ann – A relatively smooth concoction, but goes from sweet to
> > bitter
> > > > and back again many times in a single pint, usually ending on a
> > mildly
> > > > bitter note.
> > > >
> > > > Alex – crisp and light, with emphasis on crisp.
> > > >
> > > > Share – very smooth, but always with a strong finish.  (a
> > personal
> > > > favorite of mine)
> > > >
> > > > Raunchy – a true artisan, brewing a complex, original beer, with
> > a
> > > > bitter, yet sweet characteristic throughout.  The labels are her
> > bottles
> > > > reflect well the flavor within.  Said to be coming out with a new
> > brew
> > > > called SOTTPS
> > > >
> > > > Judy – At some point the fermentation process got messed up.  It
> > may
> > > > be that power got cut to the cooling tanks.  A result is a quite
> > bitter
> > > > concoction.  On the other hand, the ingredient list on the bottle is
> > > > impeccable, including the bottling date, and origin and date of the
> > > > harvest of the hops. The beer, in spite of its flaws, retains a
> > strong
> > > > following.
> > > >
> > > > Jim –Loves the King of Beers, Budweiser.  I think he just likes
> > the
> > > > idea of "King" (-:  Recently started brewing in a second venue.
> > > > The beer in the previous venue was getting a little stale beer it is
> > > > said.  Word is that they weren't really drinking much beer, but
> > > > rather spending a lot of time talking about the attributes of
> > different
> > > > beers.
> > > >
> > > > Laughinggull – Is it really beer she is brewing, or just a
> > fizzy,
> > > > sparkling beverage?  The jury is out on that, but it always tickles
> > the
> > > > insides.
> > > >
> > > > Curtis – An extraordinary brewer.  It seems his concoctions draw
> > > > outsize attention from beer critics.  He is regularly accused of
> > > > blasphemy in regards to the higher origins of the product.  And yet
> > his
> > > > critics have a difficult time making their accusations stick, as he
> > > > seems to have thought through the origins, development, and final
> > > > disposition of the product better than most people would expect.
> > > >
> > > > Nablusoss – The beer he brews is quite bitter.  Occasionally
> > some
> > > > sweetness may creep in, even if by mistake, but it greatly enhances
> > the
> > > > drinkability when that happens.
> > > >
> > > > Irantea – A good honest brew.  Dark and rich in the true
> > Bavarian
> > > > Tradition.
> > > >
> > > > Susan – Has what we used to refer to  as 3/2 beer.  Mild, and
> > not
> > > > much buzz but an alcohol beverage nonetheless.
> > > >
> > > > Xeno - A decent, but basically non alcoholic brew.  On the other
> > hand,
> > > > the highly technical brewing process as outlined on the bottle has
> > > > generated a respectable following.
> > > >
> > > > Ravi - Waaaay too much fermentation going on with this brew. In fact
> > his
> > > > brew requires special plastic packaging as the concoction keeps
> > leaking
> > > > from the bottle. And the beer itself? Rather unique, but once you
> > get
> > > > used to the pungent aroma from the leaking yeast, it is not that
> > bad.
> > > > The brew definitely has its adherents, but it is an acquired taste.
> > > >
> > > > Barry – A strong masculine beer. So strong in fact that one
> > often
> > > > gags on it.  Men have a little better time with it, but most woman
> > just
> > > > cannot handle those stout overtones and usually just spit it out. 
> > He is
> > > > said to be trying to come up with concoction with just a tad more
> > > > sweetness, but the beer drinking community seems skeptical on this
> > > > point.
> > > >
> > > > Robin – A complicated brew.  The final note never seems to end.
> > > > Plus, he says it is beer, but much of the time it tastes like malt
> > > > liquor.  The label doesn't help much in that regard.  The rumor is
> > > > that he plans to get some brewing tips from monks to help him come
> > up
> > > > with something which can positively be identified as to what type of
> > > > beverage it is.
> > > >
> > > > Emily- Not so much a beer maker as a wine connoisseur.  But she has
> > a
> > > > remarkable ability to deconstruct the different influences and notes
> > in
> > > > a given wine.  Very much an up and comer in this world.
> > > >
> > > > Edg – His beer appears to have been pulled off the market except
> > for
> > > > brief appearances.  But it is always an enjoyable potpourri whenever
> > it
> > > > does appear.  That is, with exception of a certain Texas brew.  Word
> > is
> > > > that a sample has been sent to the Center of Disease Control and
> > > > Prevention for further evaluation.
> > > >
> > > > Merudanda – The concoction is all over the place.  But the
> > label! Oh
> > > > the label is always divine.  Accolades from the beer swilling
> > community
> > > > on that one.
> > > >
> > > > Feste – What can only be described as a "mature" beer.
> > > > Respectable in every parameter.  Best enjoyed in a get together of
> > old
> > > > friends, perhaps before or after a art walk.
> > > >
> > > > Bill – A technical beer.  Quite dry, but with some good notes.
> > The
> > > > label often has footnotes on little known facts on the history of
> > beer
> > > > making.  A dictionary of Hindu and Buddhist terms is really needed
> > to
> > > > derive maximum enjoyment from this selection.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry if I forgot anybody.
> > > >
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to