It seems to me much more "natural" that the positive should attract the negative. The old 'cosmic balance' thing and all that.
Horseshit - Light chases away the shadows - the idea, often perpetrated in New Age circles, that the darkness is attracted to the Light is bullshit - and yeah, I do know that - like attracts like - if he attracted something other than light, it was his own nature. --- In [email protected], "PaliGap" <compost1uk@...> wrote: > > > > -- In [email protected], Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> wrote: > > > > Some of your assertions seem suspect to me. Like crazy people flocking to > > the supposedly enlightened or as you say those with an oz of charisma. If > > he were so sattvic and enlightened, no crazy people could get within a mile > > of him - they wouldn't be able to stand the purity. That's the way it works > > - > > You *know* that? How? > > It seems to me much more "natural" that the positive should > attract the negative. The old 'cosmic balance' thing and > all that. > > > so if he said they would flock sounds to me like a fraud knowing what kind > > of energy he's putting out > > > > So going by your example we are to ignore the testimony of the > > skin boys who witnessed him chasing women right and left > > Not at all. Did I say that? But it's sensible to retain > your critical faculties over all testimony, no? I have > read JB - I don't see *him chasing women right and left*. > It seemed to me to be a love story. Frankly I'm not sure > I'd care if he did anyway. > > "He has lovely skin. Poor man, no sex.' Brian Blessed on the > Dalai Lame. What a waste? > > >and also saw first hand the financial manipulations? > > If true, could that not be established in court? > > >Go ahead and keep your fantasy of who you believe he was - he's only been > >dead a few years - as time goes by more and more truth will surface until > >only the truly die hard TM fanatics will ever believe he was anything other > >than a top notch con artist. > > Could it be the world is not so starkly black and white as > you portray? Perhaps even... "relative"? > > I think I am a stranger to MMY "TB". I think you are > not. "The negation of the negation" as they say... >
