--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: <snip> > > > Let's, however, note that Barry had no objection to Lord > > > Knows or Bill and Brahmi "barging" in and going after > > > Robin. In fact, Barry, you loved it. > > > > Please document this claim. > > I'll be happy to. Let's take a couple of these for example: > post 316536 (Barry having his usual fun) > post 316530 (promise to correspond more offline) > post 316529 (another one of note) > post 316459 (this one's a doozie)
Good work, Ann. There was one more, his first to LordKnows, along the same "doozie" lines: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/316378 I'm going to quote from this one so everyone is clear on what "doozie" means: "Thanks for speaking up. As I have made clear in the past, I don't interact with Robin because I believe to do so is to become a codependent in helping an already mentally ill person to become more so. But it's been sad to see him 'reel in' naive people here and do pretty much exactly what you describe. "I have watched Fairfield Life and the general dance of spiritual naivete far too long to believe that those who have been sucked into his web will actually learn from what you said. In fact, they'll probably attack you for doing it. But thank you very much for trying." > You will note that not only do you interact with LK you > congratulate him on coming onto FFL and "exposing" Robin. > In addition, the two of you agree to keep corresponding > offline. I think this all qualifies as not only encouraging > LK but congratulating him on using FFL as a means to bring > up old, (way older than John Knapp's transgressions) quarter > of a century old, history. You know Barry, it doesn't matter > that you did this it only matters to me that you have such > double standards AND don't admit it. Very well done. Not only did he have no objection to LordKnows "barging in" to attack Robin--much more ferociously than anything Carol did regarding Knapp-- he was obviously very much in favor of it. And here's a little dessert, from a post of Barry's to Ann in August, after she had caught him repeating a lie he had been told by Vaj in private: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/318633 "I will *not*, however, read anything of yours in the future, or feel as if I owe you any kind of response, should you feel compelled to make one. Are we clear on this? You've been dumped. Try to handle it better than Judy has." <snicker>
