Turq mistakenly believes non-attachment to be an attitude, against attachment, 
and tries to express his ownership of anti-attachment. A fool's errand - 
nuttin' personal. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> I already see what Michael and you say about TMO as just another opinion.  
> And I think in this post to me you yourself are doing in relation to me what 
> you accused me of doing in relation to Michael.  It was meant to be helpful 
> for Michael.  I wonder why it bothers you so much. As for the elitist point, 
> I've written sufficiently about my own issues, charges, etc.  Plus I've made 
> plenty of bloopers here and apologized for them.  If you call that elitism 
> then I suggest that that is your issue.  
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: turquoiseb 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 10:34 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Co$ in the news again.....to Michael
>  
> 
>   
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Michael I'm fresh from the work of Paul Wong who comes 
> > from a background of Chinese medicine and various energy 
> > modalities. I think you practice a form of qigong. And 
> > still meditate sometimes. And work with individuals with 
> > PTSD. With all this in mind I just want to say that I 
> > wish you substantial and even complete resolution of all 
> > traumatic experiences, whatever their origin. I think 
> > you and others here have an intention to be helpful when 
> > you speak negatively about the TMO. But when there's so 
> > much negativity and delivered with such a negatively 
> > charged tone, then I think there's also some healing yet 
> > to be done.
> 
> What makes you think that this "negatively charged tone"
> is in THEM? It seems to me that a large number of people
> *project* such things ONTO the TM critics, because they're
> heavily attached to Maharishi and TM, and *their* buttons
> got pushed. They're experiencing emotions inside themselves
> that they perceive as negative, so they project the source
> of that perceived negativity onto the critic. 
> 
> > And I don't think it's just about the TMO. But in a 
> > crucial sense, that doesn't even matter. What matters is 
> > that those charges are in your body, in your brain 
> > physiology, in your energy field. Hopefully from your 
> > own experience you know what I mean. Anyway, FWIW. And 
> > you probably already know this but as your charges
> > are neutralized, to use Paul's word, all of your actions 
> > will be more effective, even those in relation to the 
> > TMO. I'm just sayin (-: 
> 
> And I'm just sayin' that this is one of the most elitist,
> superior piles of crap I've ever seen here. 
> 
> Fresh from Yet Another Indoctrination by Yet Another New
> Age Charlatan, you bring the new jargon you've just learned
> and obviously completely bought into here, and then you
> project it onto someone else. 
> 
> Yes, Michael has some attachment issues with the TMO. But 
> in my opinion those seem to pale in comparison to the
> attachment shown by those who get their buttons pushed by
> the things he says. The "negatively charged tone" I feel 
> the most here is from a few people who get their buttons 
> pushed by what he says, and either get their knickers in 
> a twist and lash out at him, or get all superior and trot 
> out the latest New Age variation on "You're just unstressing"
> and hurl it at him, as you just did. 
> 
> Why try to change Michael? That's a fool's errand, pro-
> posed by a fool. The only thing you can change is yourself.
> 
> The day you can hear the types of things he says and see
> them as Just Another Opinion, and not look down on them
> as if they're "negatively charged" just because YOU 
> react negatively to them, THEN AND ONLY THEN will
> you be in a position to offer advice. 
> 
> Just sayin'...
> 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Michael Jackson 
> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" 
> > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 8:16 AM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Co$ in the news again.....
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > as I do not believe in past or future lives I am good
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >
>


Reply via email to