I'm not sure M ever said the mantras he gave were *superior*. It's the 
naturalness and effortlessness of the technique that is superior. It goes by 
it's self. There's no concentrating or effort made and is very effective. The 
mantras are just part of the tradition he came from as is the puja and so on. 
You could transcend just as easily on *Elohim*, if you didn't have any 
association with it and used the same instruction used in TM.

 

________________________________
 From: Michael Jackson <mjackso...@yahoo.com>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for TM Cheerleaders
   
   
 
But you don't need TM to do that - so what about TM mantras are special? Cuz if 
it isn't the mantras, you can't seriously think the simple instructions given 
in the checking notes for example are responsible for TM being superior to all 
other meditation methods?

 

________________________________
 From: Mike Dixon <mdixon.6...@yahoo.com>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for TM Cheerleaders
   
  
Correct, the actual instructions on meditation are simply like taking the 
correct angle on a diving board. Once the correct angle is reached, natural 
law(gravity) does the rest, you fall into the water. Once the mantra is thought 
effortlessly, the process of transcending begins. Making any effort at that 
point,holding onto or changing the rhythm, etc. stops the process of 
transcending. If we feel like we are *forgetting* the mantra, we let it go 
because that is when we are transcending. That *gap* between forgetting the 
mantra and a new thought arising is when we transcended. With practice, that 
gap gets more and more noticeable, to the point of no mantra and no thought, 
just silence, awareness of awareness.
 

________________________________
 From: authfriend <authfri...@yahoo.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 12:11 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for TM Cheerleaders
  
  
--- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon  wrote: > > Natural 
effortlessness.  Bingo. Or more precisely, the specific instructional method 
Maharishi created (right down to the instruction to "Sit easily" rather than 
"Relax" at the start of checking).  (The puja may be part of it as well--some 
TM teachers would say so, at any rate.)  But the mantras TM uses are just plain 
ol' garden-variety bija mantras. Do a search for "bija mantra" (or "beeja" or 
"beej"), Michael, you'll find 'em all over the Web. They're said to be 
especially powerful, but they're not unique to TM.  > 
________________________________ >  From: Michael Jackson  > To: 
"mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com"; 
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>  > Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 10:31 
AM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for TM Cheerleaders >  >    >  
> Oh come on - Marshy always said TM was better than other meditations - for 
that to be true, the particular
 set of mantras have to be superior to all others. If not, what would then make 
TM better than other meditations? >  >  >  > ________________________________ > 
 From: sparaig  > To: mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com  > Sent: Tuesday, 
March 5, 2013 1:12 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for TM 
Cheerleaders >  >    > All MMY claimed about TM mantras was:  1) they are not 
om or some other monk-oriented mantra (if there are any, in his mind);  2) he 
deemed them to be suitable for householders;  3) some mantras were more 
suitable for some people than than others, and he chose a simple set that was 
reasonably beneficial for anyone, though each was presumably more beneficial 
for some people than others. MMY never claimed to be the ultimate expert on 
such matters. The impression he gave was that he intuited a few things from the 
tradition that he thought were most important and made them part of the TM 
canon.  L --- In
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, "seekliberation"  wrote: > > They are 
superior in that if you pay for them, it fills up the TMO's pockets with more 
money.  More money = Superior.  >  > seekliberation >  > --- In 
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson  wrote: > >  > >  > > 
My question is, if the TM mantras are superior, how are they >  superior? > > > 
>                 
         

Reply via email to