MJ - you have officially veered into the delusional category - you need help, thank god it's your 50th post. None of the 5 that you mentioned really commented on the actual incident in itself, I surely didn't - it's your anti-TM paranoia now delusional thinking. The kind of accusations you make are not funny MJ - you really need to get your retarded head straight.
What I said was - "Yeah all this just reiterates that MJ may be a nice guy but he is totally idiotic, emotionally stunted, delusional even to use this incredibly distressing, painful rape incident - complex in its conception and implications to peddle his anti-TM paranoia. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Michael Jackson <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > > > Idiot TM'ers or Let's Defend a Woman and her colleagues who defend wiring > their hands over rapists having to face the consequences of their actions. > > You are saying I am a bigot because I think someone who has been touted as > a great success story and example of what TM can do in a person's life > showing on a live show that is aired all over the world more, much more > concern for 2 sexual abusers than for their victim? > > Share, Feste, Ravi, Judy, and 7th Ray - you are thankfully vastly in the > minority - of the tens of thousands of comments, blogs and articles about > this situation, the vast majority are taking Harlow and Crowley to task for > their stupid, insensitive and unprofessional behavior - thank you God that > there are more people NOT doing TM in the world than those doing TM if you > are going to actually condone these women's stupidity. > > It is NEVER ok for anyone to sexually abuse or misuse a woman, period and > it is equally not ok for people to show sympathy for the abusers over the > victims. > > So to those of you who have done so, I hope it never happens to you or > your daughters if you have any, if it did I expect you will be singing a > different tune. > > I have good female friends who are survivors of sexual abuse and your > kinds of bullshit attitudes are the ones that make life much more difficult > for these survivors - in my opinion these women survivors have more beauty, > grace, integrity, courage, sattvic energy and common sense than all of you > have collectively in your entire body/mind/emotions in this and all other > lifetimes put together. > > I won't tell you to go to hell because you are already there. More than > 200,000 people have signed the petition demanding an apology from CNN for > these two women's bullshit reporting and hand wringing on behalf of the sex > abusers - but you five know better than they do - its a shame you all > aren't rajas - with your kind of thinking, you would really serve the TM > propaganda machine very well. > > And ps, if you watched the tapes of the beginning of the trial those two > little bastards were yucking it up till it became obvious they were going > to be found guilty - your sympathy is wasted on them - they are only sorry > they are being held accountable. I guess next you will say you have > sympathy for the girls arrested for threatening to kill the rape victim. TM > has reallllly made you into fine example of human beings. > > Last post of the week. And since it is, I will tell Buck don't worry about > King Tony being at risk trying to straighten things out in India, all he > has to do is think the way this lot is thinking, pat Girish on the back and > ask for a cut of the money. He will do fine. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* feste37 <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:37 PM > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: TM and its Rock Stars > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> > wrote: > > > > > > Every exchange like this just reinforces my belief that long > > > term TM makes ones brain turn into mush and removes the > > > ability to think clearly. > > > > Right, Michael, you're obviously the clear-thinking one here. > > Too bad you haven't been able to address a single one of the > > points that have been made. Too bad you can only make your > > case by wildly exaggerating what was said in that clip. > > > > > How many times do you hear reporters give a show of hand > > > wringing over the fate of convicted rapists? > > > > Is that what they were doing? Or were they deliberately > > emphasizing how bad the consequences were going to be > > for these boys *as a warning* to other boys who might > > be tempted to engage in similar misbehavior? As in: This > > was a crime, and these guys are going to suffer for it > > the rest of their lives. You don't want to end up like > > them. > > > > > A reporters job > > > is to report the facts, not commiserate with the criminals > > > > Neither of them was "commiserating with the criminals." > > That's insane. > > > > (snip) > > > Your attitude seems to be - "Oh Candy is a TM'er and so > > > anything she does is beyond reproach" - you people > > > really are screwed up. > > > > No, buster, that you would think any of us had that > > attitude is what's really screwed up. > > > > > Take a look at what the non-TM world thinks of this crap: > > > > > > "CNN's unconscionable coverage of the Steubenville Rape > > > Case verdict is pissing everyone off. > > > > For the record, there were seven segments on CNN on Sunday > > about the verdict, not just the breaking-news item, which > > is what all the fuss is about. You can check out transcripts > > of all the segments here: > > > > http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2013.03.17.html > > > > Interestingly, in the breaking-news item, following the > > appearance of the legal expert, Crowley and Harlow > > continued their discussion. Here's the transcript of > > that portion of the breaking-news item (which was not > > included in the clip): > > > > ----- > > CROWLEY: Paul, thanks. I want to bring Poppy back in -- because, Poppy, > there's -- you know, the 16-year-old victim, her life, never the same, > again. And I understand you have been talking to some of the families > involved. > > > > HARLOW: Her life never the same again. Absolutely, Candy. The last thing > she wanted to do was sit on that stand and testify. She didn't want to > bring these charges. She said it was up to her parents. > > > > But I want to tell our viewers about a statement that her mother just > made, just made in the court after the sentencing. Her mother just said > that she has pity on the two young boys that did this. She said human > compassion is not taught by teachers or coaches. It's a God-given gift, > saying that you displayed a lack of compassion, a lack of moral code, > saying that you were your own accuser throughout this for posting about > this all over social media. And she said she takes pity on them. > > > > As far as her daughter, she said she will persevere, she will get > through this. But the words of an angry mother who now has a sentence, that > I believe she would consider or a verdict, just -- Candy. > > > > CROWLEY: CNN's Poppy Harlow, thank you. Also to our legal contributor > Paul Callan. > > > > Of course, we will be following this story throughout the day. > > ----- > > > > And they did. But the jezebel.com post says: > > > > > Newscaster Candy Crowley, general correspondent Poppy > > > Harlow, and legal expert Paul Callan all did their very > > > best to focus solely on the guilty verdict's repercussions > > > on the two rapists. There's next to no coverage of the > > > girl who was brutally raped; instead, they talk almost > > > exclusively of the rapistsâ€" the two teenagers who had > > > such bright futures, and now their lives are completely > > > ruined from this one little indiscretion. Isn't it a shame > > > how they suffer?" > > > > This is simply not true, as you can see from the transcript > > above. I read the transcripts of a couple of the later > > segments on Sunday on the verdict, and it isn't true of them > > either. > > > > As I said, I'm not a fan of Crowley. But she has been treated > > unfairly in this discussion for the purpose of advancing an > > anti-TM agenda. And I think that stinks. > > > > Unfortunately, in his zeal to denounce TM, MJ has become a bigot. He > attacks Crowley simply because she is a TMer. Is that any better than > attacking someone for being a Catholic, or Mormon, or a Jew? Let's suppose > that someone is angry at the Catholic Church ("Those priests are all child > molesters!") and then finds a news presenter who happens to be Catholic and > attacks them for something innocuous they said, when his real purpose is to > display anti-Catholic bigotry. Poor MJ seems to be in a state of permanent > rage and righteous indignation, and bigotry is the result. I wish he would > go fishing or something to calm down. > > > > >
