I taught difficult technical material to adults for twenty years, by learning it on my own, first. Time for you to get off your ass and do it yourself...I am amazed at your snarkiness, given that you were supposedly a professor of something, once.
--- In [email protected], laughinggull108 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Aw shucks, dumbass, I was rooting for ya not only that you *would* do it but > *could* do it...very similar to the "dog ate my homework". Well, Steve, it'll > remain in the holy archives that you *did* try, just as others here have > asked those "in the know" to interpret the writings of you know who. The > evidence seems to be leaning towards nobody really knows what he's talking > about. Too bad as I was really hoping that we had a saint in our midst. > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Sorry Steve, too much trouble. That's why I am retired - don't have to do > > the heavy lifting anymore.:-) > > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Last week, I somehow found myself reading about fossils and the best > > > places to find them. Sedimentary rock, that which is formed by > > > compression is the only place they are found, vs. in igneous and > > > metamorphic rocks. > > > > > > > > Robin has the writing ability to work methodically down through the > > > fossil record, to the bedrock, when approaching someone's consciousness. > > > For those who doubt this, diagram out any of his writing, and you will > > > see clear first, second, and third set assumptions, each supported by > > > the previous. Very clean and perfectly constructed. > > > > > > Jim, I find this interesting. I realize it might entail some work on > > > your part, but could you give an example of this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This approach of Robin's, then, can be substantiated as being in the > > > very least, logical. Through the reactions of his targets, including > > > himself, he also (inadvertently?) reveals something about how we see > > > ourselves, often as a shifting mass of emotionally tinged reactions, > > > jellied memories. Not through this verifiable, logical deduction. > > > > > > > > Verifiable, logical deduction works well for external stuff, like > > > determining where to find the fossil record. But most people do not like > > > such dispassionate rigor, applied to their own self-examination. > > > > > > > > So Judy can argue for the validity of Robin's writing, and Steve can > > > argue for its discomfort, and both are correct. > > > > > > > > Which then begs the question, if FFL is all about a search for meaning > > > and personal truth, what are those people doing on here, who continually > > > avoid personal truth, by shifting context? What is the implicit > > > agreement we have all made, to validate the dialogue here, seek personal > > > truth, or be comfortable with each other? Or both? > > > > > > > > > >
