Dear Doctor: "Oh dear, Oh dear." I'm in pain, doctor, in pain. I'm feeling psychologically surreal. Can I get a pill for this? To make the feeling go away doctor, not to make it worse (just to say).
Now, I was pleasantly writing up a short anthology of sorts and suddenly fell to the floor, speaking in tongues. Oh dear, Oh dear. I must retire tonight to my man cave to meditate, but can you call in a prescription for something to the local pharmacy? Sincerely, Emerson >________________________________ > From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com" <doctordumb...@rocketmail.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 8:04 PM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: J gets another fact wrong and S apologizes to R > > > > >Hey Curtis, thanks for hanging in there - seriously. Beyond my basic principle >of each of us owning both our own shit, and our own gold, this conversation >has taken some really interesting turns. Very polarized, and polarizing at >times, but worth it. I like what I am learning about everyone, including >myself. > >And Em, and Share, your interaction has been awesome! I like it. Reality >speaks, and in so many voices here. I hope I sound neither voyeuristic or >preachy, I just enjoy the fuck out of an honest conversation. > >Judy, keeping that barge chugging up river, though nightfall's a comin', while >Ann plays harmonica, and R. Dog strums the banjo on deck. Spot on compass >heading, and easily overlooked. > >I'll settle back now, into my rocking chair, and listen some more. Regards, > >Doctor Dumbass -- >[By appointment only. Specializing in hair re-growth on foot soles, and the >portion of the outer ear canal, known as Herpes Bathtub. Also treating >extensive cheese allergies.] > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" ><curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: >> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" >> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: >> > > >> > > I don't suppose you ever saw the first Terminator movie Share, >> > >> > Third Terminator movie. But we're just talkin' here, no >> > need to be factual. >> > >> > > but this is what you are dealing with: >> > > >> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vCLeV7PfJs >> > > >> > > I object to being refereed to as a "Robin-hater" as if >> > > that term sums up the hours of interaction I had with >> > > the guy, or explains my more nuanced view of him now. >> > >> > "More nuanced view"--that gave me a belly laugh, Curtis, >> > thanks.> >> >> Right because you know my feelings better from what I have written here than >> I would know about myself, the Judy premise. >> >> I don't hate Robin, I found him very unpleasant when he got on his critical >> routine full time. Your constantly harshly negative take on my interactions >> with Robin show that you don't really give a shit about the guy beyond his >> usefulness for your little vendettas here. >> >> You paint a picture of our relationship as me duping his as a poor sap and >> then me making him a victim. This is not my view at all. >> >> You can't stop yourself from endlessly harping on Share's use of a phrase >> that would be long forgotten if not for your efforts to keep it alive. >> >> I know one other guy who is not fooled by your routine. I would bet on it. >> >> >> Sorta like using "non complimentary feeling" >> > to refer to Share's accusation of psychological rape. >> > Not to mention that oh-so-nuanced blue streak of >> > especially hateful falsehoods you unloaded concerning >> > those interactions after your most recent clash with >> > Robin.> >> >> >> Again, the Judy assumption that her view of my experience with Robin should >> supersede my actual experience of it. Judy knows what REALLY happened >> between Robin and me even though both of us have struggled with really >> figuring out why things went South. >> >> And surprise, in Judy's jaundiced view, it was all MY fault and poor Robin >> was just a victim. >> >> > >> > > But it is worthy of note that the people who did find >> > > some resonance with Share's term did share the >> > > experience of being at the business end of Robin's "I >> > > WILL improve you whether you like it or not" shotgun. >> > >> > Notice that Curtis does not add "more than a quarter of a >> > century ago" (for all but Curtis).> >> >> And the time factor would matter how if he is running the same game now, >> which led to the agreement? >> >> Notice also the subtle >> > use of "shotgun" as a metaphor to convey violent coercion >> > (he strongly objected to Robin using metaphors of physical >> > conflict in their discussions, BTW). Curtis doesn't miss >> > a trick. And the characterization in quotes is made as if >> > it were definitive and invulnerable to challenge (it's >> > neither, but that's another can of worms).> >> > >> > > I am cutting out everything else from this post and would >> > > like to remind the people trying to "help" Robin's online >> > > image, it is repetition that floods the search engines. >> > > What you have accomplished by this massive foot print link >> > > of his name and this term is to make it impossible for >> > > anyone to get to the bottom of this discussion, even if >> > > miraculously Share rolled over and said whatever it is that >> > > she is supposed to say to satisfy you. (My suspicion is >> > > that no such words exist.) >> > >> > "I retract my accusation that Robin psychologically >> > raped me" are the words from Share that would satisfy >> > *me*.> >> >> And she hasn't felt a desire to retract them. So you have been badgering >> her nonstop for months to try to "get" her to do so beyond all reason and >> beyond what is consistent with your stated goal of helping Robin's online >> rep. Why should she retract something because YOU don't like it? Robin >> ended up using it himself later so it must not bug him as much as you. >> >> > >> > But the really fun part here is that of the various >> > links to Robin's name in the context of the term >> > "psychological rape," the great majority will be to >> > vigorous objections to the accusation, many of them >> > backed up by documentation calling it in serious >> > question. >> >> By nutbags like YOU. You are not helping. Look how many times you have >> repeated it in THIS post. You can't resist repeating the term when I have >> carefully avoided it here. With friends like you Robin doesn't need >> enemies. >> >> > >> > Whether anyone "gets to the bottom of this discussion" >> > is immaterial. What's important is that they see that >> > the accusation sparked significant outrage and pushback; >> > it didn't just sit there like a little stinkbomb >> > unchallenged.> >> >> But you keep bringing it up dopey. Don't you get what you are doing? >> >> > >> > > So keep it up if you must, but know that I am officially >> > > blowing the lid off the cover >> > >> > AHA HAHA HAHAHA!! Curtis at his most pompous. >> > >> > > that this is all in the best interest of Robin's online >> > > image. You are doing it for your own personal reasons, >> > >> > You see, Curtis knows our thought process better than we >> > do ourselves.> >> >> No this is not the case. I don't need to know your motives I see the result. >> I am not guessing what your motives are,but I know for an objective fact >> that you are flooding the search engines with your repetition, so your claim >> that you are helping his image online IS bullshit. So the only other option >> is that you are a moron and don't realize what you are doing (but now you >> do) or you have some other reason that is personal. You haven't revealed >> what your thought process is beyond the bogus one that I am dispelling here. >> >> > >> > Bullshit, Curtis. That's another of the vicious little >> > tropes you haul out when you don't have a case. You've >> > used it quite a bit, and it's no truer now than when you >> > first manufactured it. >> >> I beg to differ and so does GOOGLE. >> >> > >> > It is, of course, a projection: Curtis has been siding >> > with Share not because he cares about her but because >> > she's useful to him in his jihad against Robin.> >> >> This is an ignorant malicious statement. Jihad? WTF/ >> >> > >> > (Or maybe he's just jealous that Robin has such strong, >> > articulate supporters, while he has to make do with Barry >> > and Steve and Xeno and Share.) >> >> My point is that his supporters are acting like idiots in this case, working >> against his best interest online by prolonging this ridiculous JIHAD against >> Share. (thanks for that, it came in handy pretty quickly.) >> > >> > > despite the fact that your fixation is hurting his online >> > > image. >> > >> > No, it ain't, Curtis, sorry. I just blew the lid off that >> > piece of disingenuous crap too. >> >> OK then carry on "helping" the poor schmuck. >> >> > >> > For Curtis, of course, the objections to Share's accusation >> > are NOT A GOOD THING. He would much rather the accusation >> > stand on its own without anybody contesting it, because he >> > figures it gives his own attacks on Robin some credibility.> >> >> Right my criticisms of Robin are contingent on Share, thank God she showed >> up. And the "contesting it" ship sailed about 7 months ago Judy. There has >> been plenty of contesting going on. I am just pointing out that your stated >> goal and what is happening are not aligned. I find it hilarious that you >> are going to continue to cut Robin's nose off to spite HIS face because i >> have mentioned this. It almost compels you to continue on this idiotic path. >> >> > >> > And the very *last* thing he wants is for Share to retract >> > the accusation. He doesn't want the work he did to turn >> > her against Robin to go to waste.> >> >> Here you are being delusional. I did nothing of the sort and had very >> little interactions with their conversations. Especially compared to you. >> Did you turn Robin against Share? No they created their relationship >> between them all on their own. Blaming me for this is part of your imagined >> conspiracy idiocy. >> > >> > That's why he's trying so hard to discourage those of us >> > who are calling Share on her slander.> >> >> Hey, I said what I wanted. Carry on. Google loves you. Keep it up >> forever. Robin's online image was created by Robin, not by Share. But now >> his writing here is being swamped by the impression that you are giving. >> That the issue of PS is a BIIIIIIG one, and might be an important >> consideration for anyone evaluating his credibility. >> >> But if he is happy with what you are creating online for him, it really is >> none of my business, so I'll bow out and watch your busy, busy work unfold. >> It is hilarious. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > > > > >
