--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Oh, pussy willow, you activist, you. I don't think your posting of your > negative views about the TMO and Maharishi, here, on FFL, have changed > anything. Have you ever even written a letter, to any of the MUM > administration, pussy willow? Yeah, I didn't think so. Given your negative > view of the world, your answer is, probably, that they wouldn't listen > anyway.
No, I think he would say he doesn't "give a shit". It's everyone who cares problem. He is just commenting on what he sees. But you have a great idea here. Barry could hire himself out as a consultant on how to deal with the TM brass and blow their socks off with a right jab here and a left knock out punch there. Organize those who have been feeling impotent and who want a voice to change things yet don't have the backbone or wherewithal to accomplish this. I have to admit though, that Barry has a point. If there was a meeting how come only one lone voice brought up any concerns they have with dome policy? It is a simple but essential point and I would wonder about the answer to that question also (I just wouldn't have phrased it using a metaphor of fucking sheep or being sodomized without the proper lubricant). I wish I cared enough to be in FF and wanted to both 'see saints' and hop in the golden globe because I would have some real fun with the Movement guys - for about the five minutes I would have until they threw me out on my ear. Still, those five minutes might be worth it, sometimes I like a good scrum. > > How self-defeating for you. So we can assume that your impotent rants on here > are nothing more than blowing off steam, enjoying that cuddly cognitive > dissonance, that you keep raving about, eh? > > Its what I call leading the charge, from the back of the pack. Bravo. To > paraphrase Senator Lloyd Bentsen, in 1988, replying to Vice Presidential > candidate Dan Quayle, "You are no LB Shriver, pussy willow". > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Actually there was only one person tonite at the landmark > > > > meeting who brushed up against this talking about how > > > > experiences have been compromised in people because of > > > > an underlying problem. She spoke in code of course with > > > > the big guy up there in front of the room. Otherwise the > > > > suggestions were trivial, as if people did not know the > > > > antipathy old meditators have with the movement with the > > > > elephant sitting in the room. Two elephants actually. > > > > > > Buck, I'm going to have to call you on this one. > > > > > > If YOU were there, why didn't YOU speak up? > > > > > > The problems with the "dome program" are NOT because > > > of the people administrating them. They're caused by > > > the roomful of pussies to timid or too intimidated > > > to say something about the policies. > > > > > > Don't you DARE keep ranting about Bevan and his gang > > > if YOU didn't have the balls to say something when > > > offered the opportunity to do so. > > > > I'm mentioning this partly because of the chorus of > > laudations for the late LB Shriver. I never knew him, > > and his contributions to FFL were before my time. But > > I've noticed a tendency in some people checking in > > here to admire him for standing up to the "powers that > > be" and actually making some of his comments and > > criticisms in public. > > > > Which is admirable, except that the people applauding > > him for doing this don't seem to do this themselves. > > They bend over and take in the ass from the TMO > > policies, then grumble safely from behind pseudonyms > > about the perps not having used any K-Y, if they > > grumble at all. > > > > NOTHING will change about the TM movement until this > > codependent enabling stops. I've said it before and > > I'll probably say it again -- if you want a change to > > these discriminatory and probably illegal policies, > > TAKE IT TO THE PRESS. Go public, and go large. > > > > Nothing terrifies tyrants more than the things they're > > doing behind closed doors being made public. Nothing > > encourages them more to *continue* doing these things > > than a bunch of terrified sheep too timid to complain > > that the shepherds are buggering them. > > >
