--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote: > > That's something the naysayers here REALLY don't understand is that you > can't do any kind of decent reading without an accurate time of birth.
I know mine exactly, apparently my mother will never forget it... However over the years here on FFL I've gotten a > pretty good sense of ascendants of members from their posts. And > recently some of those were verified. Feel free to predict mine. I'm actually interested, any data goes into the mill to be cogitated upon. Of course, we'll have to be scientific, a sample of one doesn't tell us anything. So the amount of ascendants will have to be adjusted by the amount of correct hits or misses to lift any signal above the noise but it'd be a fun way to start. > > Of course we can still expect the peanut gallery to keep throwing > peanuts. :-D Mmmmm, peanuts.... > On 06/14/2013 11:06 AM, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > Dear Ann, > > > > You didn't provide the place of birth. However I wouldn't be able to do an > > analysis because of the lack of an accurate birth-time. And more below. > > > > I also realized two things last night - one I shouldn't offer to do any > > blind analysis or offer it for any test. Because I have no emotional > > investment or financial investment in proving astrology reading, as of now > > anyway. I would have to be literally starving to request money for > > readings, even then it cannot be any fixed amount per my Brahmin > > conditioning. So you can see with the current high paying job I have - that > > possibility is very remote. The last week's discussion were very helpful to > > me personally because it gave me a chance to understand my methodology of > > astrological interpretations, that I started in 2010 and also to define the > > scope, parameters and my goals from it. > > > > So considering my goals - some sort of therapeutic purpose in performing a > > chart reading, providing insights to people based upon their chart - I > > shouldn't do blind charts, since that's not my goal. > > > > Second - in my explanation of the simplicity of my methodology I lost sight > > of the fact that my intuition also plays a critical factor in my > > interpretation. For example I randomly thought of Nancy Friday while > > contemplating on RD's chart. And I know there were lot of times I simply > > was not interested in doing a reading. There were some Indians friends of > > mine who asked me to and I didn't because Indian (immigrants) are mostly > > interested in career and money and my interpretations don't cover those > > areas. > > > > So in the light of these two things plus the fact that you don't have an > > accurate birth time I think I should give it a pass and stick to performing > > readings for actual people who approach me and for their charts. > > > > So, in hindsight - I shouldn't have agreed. Hope you understand Ann and are > > not disappointed. > > > > Ravi > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Ann <awoelflebater@...> wrote: > > > >> ** > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > >> wrote: > >>> Dear Ann, > >>> > >>> No I haven't offered any predictions - neither for you, nor for raunchy > >> or > >>> anyone else for that matter. > >>> > >>> My approach remains same for astrology reading. Sure - one could say my > >>> reading is tainted somewhat by my knowledge of you and raunchy. But I > >>> remember doing one for a lady where I didn't know anything about her and > >>> that was pretty good - based on her feedback, she was extremely happy. > >>> There weren't any predictions given, just insights into her based on her > >>> chart. > >>> > >>> So - yes, no problem, I can go ahead and do the same analysis for your > >> test > >>> chart. > >> Dear Ravi,as you know I very much loved the FEEL of your reading. It felt > >> very clean on lots of levels. It felt clean of ego, it felt very sensitive. > >> As I am an ignoramus when it comes to astrology and Jyotish you perhaps > >> felt you needed to keep it simple without reference to the planets and the > >> technical influences. But in the interest of others who DO know quite a bit > >> about it you can approach this next reading like you did Raunchy's. I still > >> understood what you said in Raunchy's analysis and for those who have a > >> deeper understanding of charts and planets they will be able to see how > >> good you are at this. But whatever you decide to do or not do just do it > >> your way. > >> > >> Birthdate October 14, 1950. The time was late morning, before noon but I > >> don't have the exact time so this might not work for you. However, I > >> believe it to be between 11am and 11:45 am. Do you want any other "hints" > >> or info on who this might be before you start? > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Ann <awoelflebater@> wrote: > >>> > >>>> ** > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Maybe Ravi would be up for a little test, or maybe not. I have a > >> birthdate > >>>> of someone I could give him. He won't know who it is but it is someone > >> I > >>>> know intimately. Maybe he could give me their analysis and some > >> predictions > >>>> regarding their life based on the chart. I would know for sure how > >> accurate > >>>> this was and share it with the group. I had thought of this before but > >> now > >>>> that you have thrown down the gauntlet maybe Ravi would be up for > >> this. On > >>>> the other hand, Ravi owes none of us anything and I wouldn't blame him > >> for > >>>> not wanting to do this particular reading of mine I have to offer. > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> >
