Loved your response dear Ann - thank you. On Jun 14, 2013, at 8:43 PM, "Ann" <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> > wrote: > > > > Dear Ann, > > > > You didn't provide the place of birth. However I wouldn't be able to do an > > analysis because of the lack of an accurate birth-time. And more below. > > > > I also realized two things last night - one I shouldn't offer to do any > > blind analysis or offer it for any test. Because I have no emotional > > investment or financial investment in proving astrology reading, as of now > > anyway. I would have to be literally starving to request money for > > readings, even then it cannot be any fixed amount per my Brahmin > > conditioning. So you can see with the current high paying job I have - that > > possibility is very remote. The last week's discussion were very helpful to > > me personally because it gave me a chance to understand my methodology of > > astrological interpretations, that I started in 2010 and also to define the > > scope, parameters and my goals from it. > > > > So considering my goals - some sort of therapeutic purpose in performing a > > chart reading, providing insights to people based upon their chart - I > > shouldn't do blind charts, since that's not my goal. > > > > Second - in my explanation of the simplicity of my methodology I lost sight > > of the fact that my intuition also plays a critical factor in my > > interpretation. For example I randomly thought of Nancy Friday while > > contemplating on RD's chart. And I know there were lot of times I simply > > was not interested in doing a reading. There were some Indians friends of > > mine who asked me to and I didn't because Indian (immigrants) are mostly > > interested in career and money and my interpretations don't cover those > > areas. > > > > So in the light of these two things plus the fact that you don't have an > > accurate birth time I think I should give it a pass and stick to performing > > readings for actual people who approach me and for their charts. > > > > So, in hindsight - I shouldn't have agreed. Hope you understand Ann and are > > not disappointed. > > I think you are right on all of this. There is no point in reading a chart > that might have the incorrect birth time. In addition, you know what you are > comfortable with and why and also how you work these things. It seems to me > it is a beautiful combination of acquired learning, evaluation, > extrapolation, intuition and experience. I would hate to put some tainted or > incomplete ingredient into that otherwise pure elixir. The Ravi combo on its > own, unadulterated, is much preferred. > > > > Ravi > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Ann <awoelflebater@...> wrote: > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Ann, > > > > > > > > No I haven't offered any predictions - neither for you, nor for raunchy > > > or > > > > anyone else for that matter. > > > > > > > > My approach remains same for astrology reading. Sure - one could say my > > > > reading is tainted somewhat by my knowledge of you and raunchy. But I > > > > remember doing one for a lady where I didn't know anything about her and > > > > that was pretty good - based on her feedback, she was extremely happy. > > > > There weren't any predictions given, just insights into her based on her > > > > chart. > > > > > > > > So - yes, no problem, I can go ahead and do the same analysis for your > > > test > > > > chart. > > > > > > Dear Ravi,as you know I very much loved the FEEL of your reading. It felt > > > very clean on lots of levels. It felt clean of ego, it felt very > > > sensitive. > > > As I am an ignoramus when it comes to astrology and Jyotish you perhaps > > > felt you needed to keep it simple without reference to the planets and the > > > technical influences. But in the interest of others who DO know quite a > > > bit > > > about it you can approach this next reading like you did Raunchy's. I > > > still > > > understood what you said in Raunchy's analysis and for those who have a > > > deeper understanding of charts and planets they will be able to see how > > > good you are at this. But whatever you decide to do or not do just do it > > > your way. > > > > > > Birthdate October 14, 1950. The time was late morning, before noon but I > > > don't have the exact time so this might not work for you. However, I > > > believe it to be between 11am and 11:45 am. Do you want any other "hints" > > > or info on who this might be before you start? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Ann <awoelflebater@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Ravi would be up for a little test, or maybe not. I have a > > > birthdate > > > > > of someone I could give him. He won't know who it is but it is someone > > > I > > > > > know intimately. Maybe he could give me their analysis and some > > > predictions > > > > > regarding their life based on the chart. I would know for sure how > > > accurate > > > > > this was and share it with the group. I had thought of this before but > > > now > > > > > that you have thrown down the gauntlet maybe Ravi would be up for > > > this. On > > > > > the other hand, Ravi owes none of us anything and I wouldn't blame him > > > for > > > > > not wanting to do this particular reading of mine I have to offer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
