Well dear Share - my brand of astrology is the best of Western (personality analysis, individualistic) and Eastern (zodiac, principles) and eliminates all unprovable philosophy/dogma - i.e. past lives, Karma, reincarnation, gems and/or other bullshit religious remedies, as long as the ascendant is good I am happy. Haven't found any use for any harmonics for my analysis as of yet.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Share Long <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > > John, Ravi and noozguru my birth time was written down on my birth > certificate as 2:55 pm which is much less suspect than 3 pm. Nonetheless > one jyotishi said if that was my true birth time I would have been a boy! > So he did a rectification, ended up with a time after after 3 and that did > not feel right to me. The best rectification was done by Prasannan, who > used to be Amma's jyotishi. He put the time at 2:48:30 and that felt right > to me. He simply asked me if I knew my Dad's mother and I said yes and gave > details. That was the basis of his rectification which I found fascinating. > Have any of you heard of this technique for rectifying birth times? > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Bhairitu <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:49 PM > *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: RD's astrological analysis > > > If anything, in the US the birth times are usually written down later > than the actual birth time. Back in those days the doctor would deliver > the kid and then take a smoke break and write down on the birth > certificate the time that was on the clock. Supposedly later a nurses > association lobbied for accurate birth times. It was suspected for > astrological purposes but I wouldn't be surprised if hospital legal > councils got on-board due to possible legal ramifications not having > anything to do with astrology. > > Happy Birthday. You now have a year before officially becoming an old > fart though of course at 59 1/2 you can take money out of those > retirement accounts without penalty. > > On 06/20/2013 02:45 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Forgot to add that I think the birth time is accurate, as it is taken > from my birth certificate. > > > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> > wrote: > >> Thank you, Ravi! Yes, I am looking forward to my 60th! Aries ascendant > is fine, also. I know nothing about this process, so I will just answer > your questions for you. > >> > >> --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> > wrote: > >>> Ah I failed to notice your birthday, so wrapped up I was in planets, > signs > >>> and houses I forgot there are days tied to a chart, and there are > birthdays > >>> :-) > >>> > >>> Happy Birthday Jim - hope you have a good one !!! > >>> > >>> In India the 60th birthday is sort of a milestone - astrologically > Jupiter > >>> and Saturn return to their exact natal position in 60 years. So I > suppose > >>> the person reaches full maturity, wisdom (unless of course your first > name > >>> is Barry and last name Wright). > >>> > >>> Coming to your birth chart - my vote is for the Aries ascendant, this > is > >>> based upon on my perceptions of you. Of course then your 3:28 AM time > >>> raises the question of whether it is a rectified TOB - is this true? > >>> Because TOB is usually rounded off to the nearest quarter hour, in my > case > >>> my TOB is 7:00 AM. > >>> > >>> But if you disagree with Aries ascendant - I will present my arguments > for > >>> it and we can discuss. > >>> > >>> Ravi > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:55 AM, doctordumbass@ < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> ** > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi Ravi, using PDT is correct. The second paragraph is overall closer > to > >>>> daily life. I have a lot of characteristics of the first, > particularly when > >>>> I had a career, but comparing the two, I am more the second one. > >>>> Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@ > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Jim - a small issue, pulled up your chart and your Ascendant is > right at > >>>>> the cusp - 29Ar33. A minute and half later and the Ascendant changes > to > >>>>> Taurus (this is the sidereal zodiac mind you). I also have the summer > >>>> time > >>>>> (PDT) - so confirm this before I proceed. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please let me know what you think identifies you - the first or the > >>>> second > >>>>> paragraph. > >>>>> > >>>>> You in you daily life are dynamic, energetic, enthusiastic, quick to > take > >>>>> initiative, react quickly. You have spent lot of your intelligence in > >>>> your > >>>>> life for an ideal or a cause, excited by the adventure and freedom, > >>>> belief > >>>>> in order, structure, respect for teachers,authoritarian figures. > >>>>> > >>>>> You in your daily life are more steady, methodical, deliberate, > >>>> practical. > >>>>> You are laidback, love pleasures of the sense - you spend lot of your > >>>>> intelligence in your life nurturing your connection to nature, land, > >>>> home, > >>>>> comfort, care towards family (though you must have felt weighed down > by > >>>> the > >>>>> responsibilities). > >>>>> > >>>>> Remember some of these themes may recur regardless of your ascendant > so > >>>>> choose one that really identifies you - the first one is Aries > Ascendant > >>>>> with Mars in 9th whereas the latter Taurus Ascendant with Venus in > 3rd. > >>>>> > >>>>> I personally think Aries ascendant, your time of 3:28 is good - but > do > >>>> let > >>>>> me know what you think. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, doctordumbass@ < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> ** > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hey Ravi, my two cents, as a dabbler in the stars, this analysis > seemed > >>>>>> deeper, more refined, than the one you wrote for Ann. Piques my > >>>> interest. I > >>>>>> took my first breath, here, at 3:28 AM, June 20th, 1954, in Chula > >>>> Vista, > >>>>>> California. What does that reflect? > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >
