> > Why he didn't say, right from the start, "yes I have 
> > struck my students, and here's the context........"
> >
authfriend:
> Two reasons. One, he was accused of striking his students
> in a very specific context in which he believed he had not
> done so; and two--well, you'll need to read the Open Letter
> for that reason.
> 
> > Wouldn't that have made a lot more sense, than issuing a
> > blanket denial?
> >
> He didn't issue a blanket denial. Steve, you really aren't
> going to get this if you haven't read the posts and don't
> remember what the situation was. Especially if you depend
> on what Barry says.
> 
You are forgetting that when Barry was a spiritual
teacher, he punched his brother in the stomach just
to make a metaphysical point. From what I've read,
Barry thinks that' funny when he does it. LoL! 

> > As I've said, and others as well, it's not about the 
> > hitting, it's about the cover up, or the "appearance" 
> > of lying.
> > 
> > And that is why I think the comparison to Clinton is 
> > perfect.
> > 
> > If you believe that oral sex constitutes sexual relations, 
> > then you say Bill Clinton was lying.  But if you don't 
> > think oral sex constitutes sexual relations, then you 
> > give him a pass.  You hold your nose, but you
> > give him a pass.
> > 
> > The fact that Robin didn't own up to the whole picture 
> > from the start, for me shows a lack of integrity.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > He didn't lie. As he said:
> > > > >
> > > > > "I did not deny something I knew was true. I denied
> > > > > what I was accused of."
> > > >
> > > > Hey Judy, can you flesh this out a little. Provide some
> > > > examples where this would be a meaningful distinction?
> > >
> > > Not sure what you mean by "examples." As you know, it
> > > refers to one specific situation, and the "meaningful
> > > distinction" is inherent in the two sentences anyway.
> > >
> > > You can read them in full context in the repost I just
> > > made of Robin's Open Letter.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to