Yes, that is true, and conforms to my experience as well. As my consciousness changes, so does my identity, and continues to.
--- In [email protected], Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote: > > The term "enlightenment" is found under most paradigms - with an attempt to > use words/concepts to define and communicate it (limited in that way) that > reflect said paradigm. Â "Localized" or "un-localized" are defined a certain > way as well to you personally - they translate in a pretty meaningless > fashion to me, for example. Â The word "you" and "exist" are also subject to > your personal understanding or definition. Â It simply depends on which > paradigm you operate under or which one rings most truthfully to you. Â > > ________________________________ > From: Bhairitu <noozguru@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:59 AM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I create my reality" Yeah, right... > > > > Â > This is the crux of what enlightenment is about. Those who are > experiencing it don't experience localized awareness unless it is > demanded (like a bill or tax collector comes knocking). The experience > is like "you don't exist." > > On 07/16/2013 10:17 AM, turquoiseb wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Emily Reyn wrote: > >> So, *you* don't exist? I have the hardest time with this concept. > >> *Who* posted what you posted? > > > >> ________________________________ > >> From: "doctordumbass@" doctordumbass@ > >> To: [email protected] > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:01 AM > >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I create my reality" Yeah, right... > >> > >> Her: > >> Beliefs (b) + Thoughts (t) + feelings (f) = Internal Reality (IR) > >> > >> Circumstances (c) + people (p) = External Reality (ER) > >> > >> Me: > >> Silence = (Internal) Reality > >> > >> All the stuff moving around in the silence = (External) Reality > >> > >> That's the difference. She is still operating on the assumption that > >> *she* primarily exists. > >> > >> --- In [email protected], Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > >>> Doc, I think she addresses both of these issues when she writes > > about noticing thoughts and feelings rather than trying to change them, > > get rid of them, etc. I think in the Buddhist tradition noticing is a > > way of quieting the mind. And she doesn't say to only notice one kind of > > thought or feeling. I don't see how you and she disagree. > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: "doctordumbass@" doctordumbass@ > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:03 AM > >>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I create my reality" Yeah, right... > >>> > >>> I personally think she is full of it. *Of course* our thoughts > > create our reality. Not just the positive, affirmative ones, but all of > > the thoughts. > >>> Most people have a non-stop mind, like yours. It is the spinning and > > looping of energy that creates most of the resonance in a non-stop mind. > > This then leads to their reality, WHETHER THAT IS THEIR INTENTION, OR > > NOT. > >>> The issue she is talking about is owning certain thoughts and > > intentions, and subconsciously disavowing others. But she is clueless > > enough about her inner state of mind, resulting in this ego-based > > drivel. > >>> More excellent evidence that you don't know yourself very well, if > > you agreed with this half-baked article. > >>> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb wrote: > >>>> A friend posted this to another forum. I do not know > >>>> the author or even of her, but I thought much of it > >>>> was a breath of fresh air in the often stale cyber- > >>>> chatrooms of New Age thought. > >>>> > >>>> Let's see what people here think of it: > >>>> > >>>> > > http://www.elephantjournal.com/2013/07/your-thoughts-do-not-create-your-\ > > reality-stupid/ > > >
