This is the crux of what enlightenment is about.  Those who are 
experiencing it don't experience localized awareness unless it is 
demanded (like a bill or tax collector comes knocking).  The experience 
is like "you don't exist."

On 07/16/2013 10:17 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> --- In [email protected], Emily Reyn  wrote:
>> So, *you* don't exist? I have the hardest time with this concept.
>> *Who* posted what you posted?
>
>> ________________________________
>>   From: "doctordumbass@..." doctordumbass@...
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:01 AM
>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I create my reality"  Yeah, right...
>>
>> Her:
>> Beliefs (b) + Thoughts (t) + feelings (f) = Internal Reality (IR)
>>
>> Circumstances (c) + people (p) = External Reality (ER)
>>
>> Me:
>> Silence = (Internal) Reality
>>
>> All the stuff moving around in the silence = (External) Reality
>>
>> That's the difference. She is still operating on the assumption that
>> *she* primarily exists.
>>
>> --- In [email protected], Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
>>> Doc, I think she addresses both of these issues when she writes
> about noticing thoughts and feelings rather than trying to change them,
> get rid of them, etc. I think in the Buddhist tradition noticing is a
> way of quieting the mind. And she doesn't say to only notice one kind of
> thought or feeling. I don't see how you and she disagree.
>>> ________________________________
>>>   From: "doctordumbass@" doctordumbass@
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:03 AM
>>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I create my reality"  Yeah, right...
>>>
>>> I personally think she is full of it. *Of course* our thoughts
> create our reality. Not just the positive, affirmative ones, but all of
> the thoughts.
>>> Most people have a non-stop mind, like yours. It is the spinning and
> looping of energy that creates most of the resonance in a non-stop mind.
> This then leads to their reality, WHETHER THAT IS THEIR INTENTION, OR
> NOT.
>>> The issue she is talking about is owning certain thoughts and
> intentions, and subconsciously disavowing others. But she is clueless
> enough about her inner state of mind, resulting in this ego-based
> drivel.
>>> More excellent evidence that you don't know yourself very well, if
> you agreed with this half-baked article.
>>> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb  wrote:
>>>> A friend posted this to another forum. I do not know
>>>> the author or even of her, but I thought much of it
>>>> was a breath of fresh air in the often stale cyber-
>>>> chatrooms of New Age thought.
>>>>
>>>> Let's see what people here think of it:
>>>>
>>>>
> http://www.elephantjournal.com/2013/07/your-thoughts-do-not-create-your-\
> reality-stupid/
>

Reply via email to