"The" path? Ha.
________________________________ From: Bhairitu <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 1:23 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I create my reality" Yeah, right... It will make more sense to you once you've started down the path. On 07/16/2013 12:32 PM, Emily Reyn wrote: > The term "enlightenment" is found under most paradigms - with an attempt to > use words/concepts to define and communicate it (limited in that way) that > reflect said paradigm. "Localized" or "un-localized" are defined a certain > way as well to you personally - they translate in a pretty meaningless > fashion to me, for example. The word "you" and "exist" are also subject to > your personal understanding or definition. It simply depends on which > paradigm you operate under or which one rings most truthfully to you. > > ________________________________ > From: Bhairitu <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:59 AM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I create my reality" Yeah, right... > > > > > This is the crux of what enlightenment is about. Those who are > experiencing it don't experience localized awareness unless it is > demanded (like a bill or tax collector comes knocking). The experience > is like "you don't exist." > > On 07/16/2013 10:17 AM, turquoiseb wrote: >> --- In [email protected], Emily Reyn wrote: >>> So, *you* don't exist? I have the hardest time with this concept. >>> *Who* posted what you posted? >>> ________________________________ >>> From: "doctordumbass@..." doctordumbass@... >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:01 AM >>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I create my reality" Yeah, right... >>> >>> Her: >>> Beliefs (b) + Thoughts (t) + feelings (f) = Internal Reality (IR) >>> >>> Circumstances (c) + people (p) = External Reality (ER) >>> >>> Me: >>> Silence = (Internal) Reality >>> >>> All the stuff moving around in the silence = (External) Reality >>> >>> That's the difference. She is still operating on the assumption that >>> *she* primarily exists. >>> >>> --- In [email protected], Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: >>>> Doc, I think she addresses both of these issues when she writes >> about noticing thoughts and feelings rather than trying to change them, >> get rid of them, etc. I think in the Buddhist tradition noticing is a >> way of quieting the mind. And she doesn't say to only notice one kind of >> thought or feeling. I don't see how you and she disagree. >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: "doctordumbass@" doctordumbass@ >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 4:03 AM >>>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I create my reality" Yeah, right... >>>> >>>> I personally think she is full of it. *Of course* our thoughts >> create our reality. Not just the positive, affirmative ones, but all of >> the thoughts. >>>> Most people have a non-stop mind, like yours. It is the spinning and >> looping of energy that creates most of the resonance in a non-stop mind. >> This then leads to their reality, WHETHER THAT IS THEIR INTENTION, OR >> NOT. >>>> The issue she is talking about is owning certain thoughts and >> intentions, and subconsciously disavowing others. But she is clueless >> enough about her inner state of mind, resulting in this ego-based >> drivel. >>>> More excellent evidence that you don't know yourself very well, if >> you agreed with this half-baked article. >>>> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb wrote: >>>>> A friend posted this to another forum. I do not know >>>>> the author or even of her, but I thought much of it >>>>> was a breath of fresh air in the often stale cyber- >>>>> chatrooms of New Age thought. >>>>> >>>>> Let's see what people here think of it: >>>>> >>>>> >> http://www.elephantjournal.com/2013/07/your-thoughts-do-not-create-your-\ >> reality-stupid/ >> > >
