--- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Oh'yes, and it's quite cosy in here too :-) > > > > > > > > > > Robin was one of thousands of CP's at the time, he wasn't > > > > > as important to Maharishi as you seem to think. > > > > > > > > I don't think you're in a position to know that, actually. > > > > > > I obviously don't have the whole picture and nor have you. > > > > Absolutely correct. However, the *facts* of the case > > don't support your interpretation. > > > > > > Seems to me that if Robin had in fact achieved Unity > > > > consciousness, he would have been a *very* big deal to > > > > Maharishi, exactly because he was the only one of those > > > > thousands of CPs who had "made it," ostensibly proving > > > > that TM was what Maharishi said it was. > > > > > > If you believe only 1 person received enlightenment on those > > > courses please think again. > > > > How come he made a big deal of Robin on his course but > > not all those other people? > > If Maharishi suggested someone from say, Khazakshtan, India > or Thailand was in Unity, would you have heard about it ?
I didn't say *I* would have, Nabby. Why do you keep changing what I've said? I was never a TMO insider. I might not have heard about Robin either if he hadn't made a huge splash messing around at MIU. But the initiators on courses would have known about anyone in India or Thailand or anywhere else reaching Unity consciousness, unless--unlike with Robin--it had been kept a big secret, including by Maharishi. > Even if it had been someone > > on another course, Robin and all the other CPs would > > have known about it. > > Not necessarily. Contrary to what you seem to think, the US > and Canada is not the centre of the universe. This course was in Switzerland and had participants from all over, not just the U.S. and Canada. (snip) > > > Because he trusted the information to stay there. > > > > Ooops, looks like he made a mistake, then. > > If trusting the people to follow his advice is a mistake, > then yes. Finally. Now all you have to do is try to explain why Maharishi didn't try to remedy the mistake, at least partially, by telling Robin not to teach on the basis that he was enlightened. (snip) > > > > "What an impossible task he took upon himself, still he > > > > managed to pull it through with the support of the Masters > > > > of the Holy Tradition." > > You're mistaken if you believe The Holy Tadition are not one. > Benjamin Creme has discussed this in some length and stated > that the "differences" between the Masters stem from > personality, rays and seniority in Enlightenment and > Masterhood. Discussions are there but They always come to a > unified conclusion. So the Masters of the Holy Tradition came to the unified conclusion that Maharishi hadn't made any mistakes in how he handled the Robin situation. Nabs, you've set yourself up to be sitting between the devil and the deep blue sea here. Maharishi *could* have handled it very differently so that Robin wouldn't have ended up in big trouble, but he didn't. You can't blame Robin for that.
