Well Barry's never had an issue with Rory Mark II because Rory Mark II 
never had anything much to say to Barry's dishonest tantrums other than
wavicle, particle,  me, Us, love, light, laughter bullshit. Perhaps Rory
had an opening at  the Rorian Mystery School and was looking at Barry as
a potential  student? We will never know and perhaps it is destined to
remain a mystery.


--- In [email protected], "emilymae.reyn"  wrote:
>
> Rory, I am glad you are back and here.  Amazing what removing limits
will do. Smile.  FFL needed a little influx of love, light, and
laughter.  Even Barry deigned to talk to you!
>
> --- In [email protected], "RoryGoff" rorygoff@ wrote:
> >
> > Hey, Ravi! Thanks for asking. I can see how it would seem like
abstract, vague bullshit. I don't know if I can make it much clearer or
more concrete, but I will give it a shot. It often appears as if every
one, every body, is "in" me, in my bodymind, in my being. When people
get my attention, we engage, energetically. That doesn't mean I
understand them, necessarily; most often I don't at first. Often they
present themselves to me as being in pain, or perhaps just as a
tension-point. Sometimes I get lost in the suffering at first. But as I
attend to them (or to the aspect of me that appears to me as them) and
love them, I integrate them, or at least that side of them/me I am
seeing at the moment, and we end up feeling really good together,
dissolving together in light and bliss. It is not unlike lovemaking, in
a way. I am not sure why you mention Amma; I do not consider myself a
guru nor a guru's follower, nor do I particularly wish to be.
> >
> > Hope this helps a bit. Love You.
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula  wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't doubt your intentions dear Rory but you are spouting vague
> > > philosophical bullshit dear Rory, you just came up with more. I'm
sure you
> > > think you are being real in yourself. I have seen tons of people
in
> > > spiritual circles - they are very genuine, very real, very
dedicated
> > > unfortunately it is either religious, delusional pursuits or vague
> > > philosophical bullshit like you.
> > >
> > > What the fuck "do you mean heal and integrate those parts of you
that are
> > > in and of me" - can you fault anyone for interpreting it as some
abstract,
> > > vague bullshit - unless you want to clarify? What have you healed
and
> > > integrated of me and in you?
> > >
> > > Please don't take it personally - neither you nor anyone else I
have seen
> > > around Amma were anything but nice people.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:32 PM, RoryGoff  wrote:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ah, dear Ravi; so you think I am spouting vague philosophical
bullshit to
> > > > avoid being real? Perhaps so, but it does not feel that way to
me. As I
> > > > interact with Share, or Barry, or you, or anyone, I really feel
you in me,
> > > > I attend to you in me, I love you in me, I heal and integrate
those parts
> > > > of you that are in and of me.
> > > >
> > > > What I say is almost always, almost meaningless, and it almost
always will
> > > > be; it is merely a vehicle for transmitting love between us.
That in my POV
> > > > is as real as it gets.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *L*L*L*
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > No dear Rory - it's not fiction, it's a beautiful sounding
philosophy. If
> > > > > it were fiction no one would fucking bother reading it because
it's so
> > > > > cryptic, vague, boring as hell.
> > > > >
> > > > > As you can see from your audience - Share and Barry, both
delusional -
> > > > one
> > > > > playing along with you, one playing against you apparently.
The more
> > > > > beautiful the philosophy the more it attracts the delusional,
because
> > > > being
> > > > > oneself, being authentic, being open, being vulnerable is a
hard, being
> > > > > fascinated by some garbage philosophy and the peddlers of such
garbage
> > > > > philosophy like you, the myriad Gurus, teachers is easy.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, RoryGoff  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > **
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > WHAT, Ravi?!? You don't regard what I write as fiction?! I
am shocked
> > > > and
> > > > > > insulted. And really really mad.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *kiss*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *L*L*L*
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LOL..you reminded me of my childhood.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was 9 or 10 and then there was a pocket Bhagavad Gita at
my house.
> > > > I
> > > > > > > would start reading it, it would always go...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *"Dharmakshetrey Kurukshetrey...blah blah..kim karoti
Sanjaya?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > I would read that first verse always and then get bored
and throw the
> > > > > > book
> > > > > > > away. And move on fiction, something interesting.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the same with Rory and Jim's garbage.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:45 PM, obbajeeba
[email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > **
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bhahaha. You two are going to entice me to post with one
word at a
> > > > > > time. I
> > > > > > > > think I will recite (copy and paste) the Bhagavad Gita
that way,
> > > > right
> > > > > > > > now......
> > > > > > > > Staring from the first page. Does anyone have a
preference to which
> > > > > > > > version I should post or at least start with?
> > > > > > > > Remember, enlightenment comes one
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > word
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > time. :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am kidding, I promise not to do the above.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Laughing over here, imagining Ravi is rag and Judy
calming the
> > > > > > waters...
> > > > > > > > Now for the complete, Bhagavad Gita, one word post at a
> > > > > > > > time...............I lied, I am going to do it..
> > > > > > > > watch me...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula
> > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No dear Judy I will not cool it. I'm fucking raging.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But I think the problem's just Rory, Jim and Share, if
they can
> > > > > > fucking
> > > > > > > > > shut up for the rest of the week we will be fine. The
problem is
> > > > > > there is
> > > > > > > > > nothing concrete in their posts - it's like 100
message of Rory,
> > > > Jim
> > > > > > > > > talking about vague garbage and then 50 innocent
questions from
> > > > > > Share to
> > > > > > > > > them you see.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have seen this bullshit at the batgap list. This is
the same
> > > > game
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > Amma
> > > > > > > > > - she talks about vague garbage, philosophy,
platitudes for her
> > > > > > > > delusional
> > > > > > > > > devotee base.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm curious - is Jim and Rory can devoid of the TM,
Maharishi
> > > > > > > > > philosophy/lingo/garbage explain what is the
bottomline.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, authfriend  wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ravi
Chivukula"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yes dear Obba this is too much crap, this
unlimited posting.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cool it, Ravi dollink. This first week is like a
crowd
> > > > > > > > > > of malnourished folks suddenly having access to a
banquet;
> > > > > > > > > > everybody's going to overeat. It'll calm down pretty
soon.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hey Jim, Rory - I know you guys are helpless
victims of your
> > > > IED
> > > > > > > > > > > (Intellectual Enlightenment Disorder) and can't
stop
> > > > spamming,
> > > > > > > > talking
> > > > > > > > > > > about your UC, BC garbage but is it possible you
can email/IM
> > > > > > each
> > > > > > > > > > > other. Take my dear Aunt Share with you - she is
the only one
> > > > > > > > delusional
> > > > > > > > > > > enough to entertain you guys. Or perhaps the
BATGAP list?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Can you do that for the rest of the normal people
like *Us*
> > > > > > here, I
> > > > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > > > > your *me*'s are very nice, and humble
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Or just condense your fucking bullshit and the
number of
> > > > posts
> > > > > > > > please.
> > > > > > > > > > > Make it easy on *Us* non-UC folks. Is that too
much to ask?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Love, Light, Laughter
> > > > > > > > > > > Ravi
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to